you’re so weird, dude. everyone learns about binary in their first elementary computer class. you think it’s some extremely difficult math course? weird.
come on, you’re just embarrassing yourself at this point. it’s getting ugly.
So why don’t you understand the difference between (A AND B) and (A OR B)?
No, it’s such basic stuff that I’m pointing out someone that actually had a Master’s degree in Mathematics would absolutely, 100% know this information. By demonstrating that you do not know the difference, it aptly shows how unlikely your claim to hold the degree is.
You made it personal for him a few months back by creating an account using his name and posting your same lame twaddle AS him. Wasn’t long though before legitimate forum users outed you like a cockroach, and now, true to your form, you’re scrambling from the light and trying to deflect it.
If MB was trolling we would let him know. Reality is you are a confused attention seeker and somehow continue to succeed at finding new levels of trolling. So the only one succeeding is you at trolling.
Except for that aforementioned “Only Jesseth set” assertion that you so boldly made, and I proved you wrong in the first response to that thread, well before the season even started. Remind me again how you were right about Jesseth set being the “only viable” build that season? How many of the top 1000 used Jesseth set that season? I’ll wait…
You’ve been proven wrong numerous times throughout your history on the forum, maybe if you “actually” played the game instead of the forums, you’d learn a thing or two about the game mechanics and also some humility wouldn’t be a bad thing to work on. No one like a bragger who constantly needs to puff out their chest to demonstrate how “alpha,” they are
I’m wrong all the time. It’s generally my best opportunity to learn something new.
If you believe you’re never wrong, you will never learn a thing. You’ll just keep milling around in the echo chamber of your mind.
It’s also been proven through studies that people with minds open to being wrong and learning new things and perspectives tend to be highly intelligent while those who are certain of their own knowledge indicate towards lower IQ’s.
Sure can. And hence a blind person can see that you failed to comprehend what I wrote.
Reading comprehension also being another sign of intelligence or lack there of.
This is not what I said, you took my words and moved them around to fit your agenda. That or you flat out where unable to understand what I was saying.
I mean, not that you care or will acknowledge what I am about to write as true, but my information does not come from a poster.
It comes from multiple studies that I have read up on and watched video’s about.
My new knowledge gathering goes as such:
Find a topic I am interested in or fills a gap in my current knowledge/understanding.
Look for a reputable source of that knowledge.
Stop, check for confirmation bias. If what I am reading/hearing is so in line with what I already believe or want to believe, I acknowledge the risk I run of losing objectivity.
Research the same topic from another source.
Then research the opposing view. Find something that disagree’s with what I have learned and check it for veracity.
Once all that is complete I allow myself for form an opinion.
In the case I stated above about indicators or behaviors consistent with high/low intelligence, this is the process I followed. Multiple studies from multiple angles written by people not just referencing other people’s work but having performed their own.
What I learned from that for myself is that I do have a number of high IQ indicators but there are one or two other behaviors I could adapt that would allow me to grow in my intelligence, understanding and critical thinking.
Hence, I was ‘wrong’ about several things but having learned where my weaknesses are and can now work to overcome them.