Hah. who told you that? again you have wet fantasies that you see in the reflection of your mirror?
Anyway - go away when leaving and do not pretend to be a fool that cannot act in accordance with own words.
It doesn’t matter, unlike you, I came here on business, not to fooling around.
Go already where you went there and do not return without a brained head.
Now I am skeptical look at you as a reasonable person - you are something else trying to mimic it.
Because bug, no?
You are mistaken - all they did was give advice of various dubiousness to use what is. Again, they didn’t say a word why it wasn’t a bug - exactly what I was talking about, not what they imagined.
I did not attack them, I just noticed that they listen inattentively to the interlocutor before accusing me of misunderstanding. And expressed dissatisfaction with this fact.
If you read carefully, you would notice that I am talking about different things - in one case, this is a general description of the set bonus and how everything works until you encounter a bug, and in the second case, a description of how this bug manifests itself and what it consists of.
You also cannot get it in your head that the bug only applies to channeling a skill that works together with support skills? They, from the point A, for some reason could not do this. I wonder why so?
You are mistaken again - if you carefully re-read the posts, then make sure that much of what was said on their part was not aimed at a reasonable discussion of the issue, but just what you are describing - laugh at, call a noob pressing on their veterancy no matter how, fool around, over and over again ignore explanations and count crows, trolling, and yes, call stupid.That is, what they do you consider absolutely normal? Everything is clear with you…
I’ll ask you - where from the above is a reasonable approach to discussion the issue?
And with what fright the offer to use something else is proof that this is not a bug? This can be said about any bug - just avoid it and you will be happy. A bug is that phenomenon that cannot be dealt with by any advice, since it will not go away from it.
Did you ask them about it? Why, instead of a constructive approach to discussion of the issue, on their part a begins circus with horses jumping over burning huts?
They leave, but cannot resist their habits and return, but they is still nothing to say to here in essence.
Why are they coming back? If they can say in essence - welcome, otherwise they will be appreciated for what they are - for do not mock at those around you and you will not be measured by the same measure! I am generally against this way of self-affirmation at the expense of others, but what answer will I find if they so insistently want to discuss it.
Did you even read what I wrote, or did you count the crow again? I have never refused to understand the mechanics as they are now - I said, I say and I will say that there is a small and annoying bug in this mechanic. Until proven otherwise.
Can you tell me which word you don’t understand in the following sentence? As long as support skills provide the damage type change on their own, all your words are empty, especially when channeling the skill at that moment does not damage anyone.
What word from this sentence cannot reach your brain? Or maybe you do not understand the letters in which it is written?
There are no channeling skills that deal their damage type only once at the start of use - the whole mechanics of the game is against it!
After all, I did not just suggest that you independently verify this for yourself - this way this fact would reach you more fully and much faster. That is why bugs are bugs, not features, because they work contrary to the formal logic of the game mechanics. And yes, until this bug is fixed, everyone plays with what they have, but this is not proof that it should be so.
Please, remind me why I’m still trying to explain you obvious and logical things?
Again: when you channel a skill, it is considered a single attack! That means it can proc the meteor only once, no matter how many times it “ticks” the damage. The damage dealt is taken into consideration only once per attack. If you use channeling skill, you have to stop channeling, use another skill with different element and then channel again to proc the meteor from the channeled skill. It is a very simple concept.
Everyone else here and I absolutely everyone understands how things work and many of them have tried to explain how and why they work as they work. Sticking your fingers into your ears won’t change the fact there’s no bug.
Using channeled skills is also very unpractical with Tal Rasha as they lock the character in place, reducing mobility. You should not stay put in one place too long. Keep moving around, keep the TR stacks up and pummel everything with manually casted meteor. Using channeled skills is rather detrimental for your gameplay with Tal Rasha.
Who said that? The description says only about inflicting one type of damage in a row, no matter from what source. Then, if everything was like that, then the support skills would not alternate the type of damage more than once, but this is not so.
And again I will ask you - what word do you not understand in that sentence?
I repeat if you haven’t noticed this nuance - the channeling skill should not be considered as one attack if it does not cause damage to anyone at the moment of changing the type of damage with a support skills. This is bug and you can’t prove me otherwise - saying that this is how it works now you only confirm its existence.
Well, yes, forced to do this because of a bug and nope, there is an even simpler concept - use same skill again, i.e. spamming, since nothing needs to be changed - the support skill(s) have already taken care of this.
I don’t remember how many times I said this, but all of them were successfully ignored by you - this is one of the reasons why I am very doubtful about what you say.
You are not not understanding - you are thoughtless players and again you are trying to change concepts. And, yeah you don’t understand, don’t flatter yourself - given that you don’t understand how support skills work with channeling the skill.
Te opposite is also true - sticking your fingers into your ears won’t change the fact that there bug. You are doing exactly that - plugging your ears and trying to change the issue.
Since further you are already spreading thought outside the issue under discussion, I will draw your attention to this and selecting it separately.
You again do try to change the issue - practical, not practical, all this does not apply to the issue. This has nothing to do with the fact that there is a bug and does not detract from its presence.
I kind of told you before that I use it first for the control effects and then for everything else?
I agree with this, but I note that there are times when it is useful. Generally, it’s not the same for everybody.
Haha, then the set itself is not needed at all - everything is decided by a manual Meteor and against its background, this set bonus does not solve, well, excluding the usefulness of other bonuses in this set.
Here I will probably refrain from agreeing with you. I have only two (three) active skills - a Ray of Frost (Disintegrate) skill for small and medium targets and a Meteor skill for large ones, I don’t need more.
Very often I combine them with each other - for example, first use the Meteor skill once or twice and while it is preparing, move around with the channeling beam and pull the mobs closer under it. In general, there are different approaches and tricks for this.
This, however, is both true and untrue. Channeling spells don’t continually retrigger Meteor. Is there weirdness with you having to stop channeling in order to retrigger your meteor from your channeling spell? It wouldn’t surprise me.
I am mystified this thread is over 100 replies long. Does Tal Rasha work right? Not particularly. But it works well enough Meteor is functional. /shrug
Hey, all the good samaritans who are present here and who cannot sleep, how they wish to benefit me with their “help” - before you start doing your black work, I urge all your sanity to think about what you are trying to prove to me and why you are doing it.
Within the framework in which I indicated the existence of a bug earlier - you will not be able to prove anything to me, since you do not have suitable arguments for this that would reasonably explain why this should be so. It’s time for you to understand that this is a pointless attempt, over and over again, repeating - it’s not a bug because that’s how it works now. Since this is a classic logical dead end, where x is explained through y and has no solution.
All this reminds me of a joke about a blonde who is told (I) that her car has a flat tire, and she (you) answers “But I drive, so it’s all right!”.
I am still skeptical look at you as a reasonable person - you are something else trying to mimic it.
Yes, no one will troll you better than yourself - time after time you all lose your battle with common sense, so this was your best self-trolling I have ever seen. )
People asked very much, how not to respect their request - so strong, so strong and so strong too. But it was a bug and a bug remains.
I will say this again and you can try to think about my words, if, of course, you are familiar with the concept of common sense : I repeat if you haven’t noticed this nuance - the channeling skill should not be considered as one attack if it does not cause damage to anyone at the moment of changing the type of damage with a support skills.
Of course, this is very funny to me, as well as the bug that when spamming, large bosses completely freeze for the entire duration of this action - this is a very useful bug-feature.
As well as the fact that sometimes they die instantly when spamming, without a long prelude with the fall of meteors.
It even happens that they remain standing still after their death, and they can continue to be senselessly attacked.
But shh, I didn’t tell you that - the first two are good bugs, no need to fix them. )))
I think at this point pretty much everyone has given up on trying to prove anything to you, as you refuse to listen. What’s probably going on now is that people are giving advice in the hope that anyone other than you reading the thread will see the advice and, hopefully, follow it so that they can play Tal Rasha properly, i.e. not how you’re doing it.
I seem to have said everything about the bug - it is quite difficult to prove that it is not there, so they did the right thing by stopping trying to prove that playing with a bug is completely normal.
As for my way of playing - you will agree that if I am wrong, then in this case I will punish myself in a way that no one else can do it, so that will be my big problem. But, if I still turn out to be right, that in general it is checked quite easily and what you don’t really want to do, then the situation is already reversed - you punish yourself and look rather stupid at the same time.
As we have already seen, you yourself do not have a very good idea of how the set bonus mechanics work, so your advice “how to play it right” is more like bad advice, a kind of disservice to those who, thanks to you, will get a wrong idea of how it works.
This entire 100+ post thread is everyone else telling you that not only is this not bugged, they’ve explained why it’s not bugged, how the set actually works and why the way you’re playing it is why it’s not working for you.
This season I played a Tal Rasha wizard and had absolutely no problems what-so-ever getting lots of meteors to proc from the set bonus. I seem to understand the mechanics just fine. However, I only played it long enough to unlock the Guardian cosmetics, so my play time in total was only about 35.5 hours. With pretty poor gear, a handful of augments and with all three of my legendary gems under rank 30, I did a GR113 (I stopped when I ran out of keys), with less paragon than your wizard currently has…
So, if you’re doing it right, what are your records this season?
Here’s little example of my non-seasonal run of TR Meteor:
Yes, my gear is mostly augmented and I have ~2.5k paragon but this my personal variant of the less powerful, casual friendly Comet build. And I wasn’t even pushing it, I merely did a quick speed run. I have no idea how far I could push this thing.
Imagine how high the far more powerful Star Pact variant could go…
Sergotary decided to don’t understand how the set works. Too bad for him. He will come back with yet another comments like “You’re a troll”, “You don’t understand what I mean” and so on.
Sergotary, good luck with your Deathwish, Etched Sigil and Ranslor’s Folly.
But, to your regret, you couldn’t prove anything, because you didn’t have reasonable arguments.
Happy for you. At least something joyful in your life, in addition to dripping poison on those around you.
It only seems to you, since you never learned how to play with channeling.
Over time, of course, can’t argue, but this doesn’t mean anything, since the season can be run with difficulty 10. What is there to brag about?
In other points, you have already shown yourself to be a person who cannot be unconditionally trusted.
Didn’t play at all. And should I? I kind of play infrequently and for my own pleasure, and not for the sake of some dubious records. You decided to boast at the wrong time and in the wrong place.
I do not understand at all on what point you continue to try to argue with me.
With the fact that support skills drop their meteors one after another?
Or with the fact that I don’t have to use another skill to change the damage type and just use the channeling skill again to get its type damage meteor again?
Maybe with the fact that pulling mobs under meteors is sometimes more convenient and easier than using the Meteor skill?
No, it all works and, most importantly, it is very easy to check.
Yes. Good luck!
It says stupidity and resentment in you, not a glimpse of common sense - not a single ray of light of the mind in your dark kingdom.
I am still skeptical look at you as a reasonable person - you are something else trying to mimic it.
Yeah thanks. No one said that everything should be unchanged, so I continue to quietly improve my version of the build - so I remove something and I add something.
Mind you, none of those dripping poison like you tried to help and advise something sensible about this, like - this item doesn’t really suit your build, better take this one. )))
This is what is called real help, not imaginary - where you showed only your inability to have a reasonable dialogue.
No matter how unfortunate it seems to you - you can’t know because you haven’t tried it yourself. Only therefore all your words are empty and demonstrating your stupid desire to assert yourself at the expense of others.