There should be a limit, I agree. All widescreen? obviously not, the game was sold with widescreen support. I’ll leave it to the devs to figure out, but yes there should be a limit.
1 Like
Not a limit, a set size for everyone or its not fair. everyone must see the same thing, same size.
Hey good luck with that!
1 Like
i mean it will be unfair if people are able to see more loot on the floor then other due to screen size 
i never once prebuffed from cube… for a duel.
and i have even prebuffed using another char with my lvl 56 enchant or my barb bo.
and my mid lvl duel rabies +fireclaws very much used 10 SS GC’s
also, if everyone already does it then why are people complaining about balance changes. there is no difference in that case.
1 Like
Because this way you can prebuff more/sorb/ have an extra weapon slot essentially/etc.
It really messes with team duels/ public the most. even prebuffing from cube vs 4x10 already gives you an extra 2 skillers…what do you mean it wouldn’t change anything?
i think your are drastically overestimating the people who use prebuff in duels outside of weapon swap… its really not as bad as u think it is.
the most i generally prebuff is enchant… and thats always from my offhand…
i would stay swapping CTA in and casting your things like venom with 2x +6 claws would be more of an issue… if we were even going to go that far, but i just hate cta in general. i think its the most problematic runeword… its incrediably annoying and u get people overriding your migh higher buff as a barb in a party becuase they are just “used to casting it”.
it ruins duels imo
But you are affecting the number of charms when you add a charm inventory. So no charm inventory.
no… you’re not… a “charm inventory” doesn’t add “charm space”… it add non-charms space…
this is an extremely simple concept… we want to be able to add more inventory space for QOL… if we did that by itself it would allow more charms, and would therefore affect balance, so we prevent charms from working in the newly added space. people just starting calling the old 4x10 inventory space “charm inventory” and the name stuck…
This is such a ridiculous argument.
It’s literally called a charm inventory = inventory for charms.
You’re trying to use language in a dishonest way to get what you want. No one is buying this absolutely crazy argument that charm inventory is anything other than an inventory for charms. Full stop.
hey i didn’t freaking come up with the name, and yeah i agree its a terrible name for it… but that when u use it you refer to the “old 4x10 space” as a “charm inventory”
your not “Adding” a charm inventory your adding other space… but the bottom half (the old 4x10 space) basically became a place for charms by the time u reach max build
also its a way to distinguish why charms don’t work in the old space people wold ask “why isn’t my charm working” and we would tell them have had to put it in the lower half… and people just started calling it a “charm inventory”
yes its a terrible descriptions because its not adding adding charms space but rather the opposite. but i don’t freaking control that… its not “my term” i didnt come up with it.
its something that exists and words the exact same way across multiple d2 mods and that’s is just what the lower 4x10 space is called.
all I’m trying to do is tell you that just because u don’t know or like what it implies doesn’t me you can just try to change it to mean something else.
what a charm inventory is… how its works… isnt up for debate…
if u want to debate how much more non inventory space to add sure. that is a good discussion that should be had, should it be another 4x10? should it be 4x5. 5x10, 6x10 4x4 all of that is up for debate and different mods do it differently
but stop trying to argue with the actual definition of what it is. you cant choose to ignore that existing definition just because " you don’t like it".
and yes it it does SOUND like your adding a separate space for charms, i get that, and i 100% agree its a terrible name for it… but it was named AFTER it existed, colloquially
but that doesn’t change what it IS.
people say “shako” and not “harlequin crest” but if u say “shako ft” and come with a 1 soc white one people is going to attack you"… just because its people dont say “unique shako” doesn’t mean that’s not what it refers to… its just the name it was given by the community.
just accept it and move on.
realistically as better description would be “non-charm inventory” as that’s whats being added. but until the community as a whole and in every mod gets together and redefines what it means… then it means what it means… any being angry that the name does a terrible job of describing it helps no ones.
Charm inventory is pretty common in gaming nomenclature, and you are incorrect, despite whether or not a few people in uncommonly-used mods for a 20 year old game use them to mean something completely different than the entire gaming universe.
Sorry, but charm inventory is not what you are describing.
1 Like
also known as half the active d2 community but… okay…
Doubtful. How would you even quantify that vs legit single player? I still know many people who play D2 and not on mods or bnet. You’re comparing only multiplayer on a server that works reasonably as far as I can see most of the time, and the garbagefire that is current bnet, and vpn bans.
The thing is these “two definitions” are exactly the same thing… this is a bit absurd.
It doesnt matter if we’re getting a dedicated charm inventory or another inventory for items which causes our “old inventory” to only accept charms… these things are exactly the same. The result is we have an extra 4x10 space where only charms can go. This is ridiculous.
So you get a “non-charm inventory”… ok. And then our first inventory can only accept charms? Give us a break.
2 Likes
no… u can still put items in the “charm inventory”… its not "limited to charms… it works EXACTLY like the old 4x10 space
in path of diablo if u want to run the entire 9x10 space as storage you can 100% do that, but only the original space… the bottom 4x10 will charms function in… you can pick up charms… even store then in the top inventory… but they wont have any effect outside of the bottom 4x10 space all you did was add a 5x10 space on top of the original space, u didn’t change the original space in any way
It really does sound disingenuous. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you don’t know these things are the exact same thing in practice, Switfkitten, but it really does seem like you’re trying to use ambiguous language to intentionally deceive people to your position. Charm inventory, Charm-non inventory, whatever you want to call it, it is exactly the thing the devs were talking about changing the game and having less inventory management choices.
This goes even further against what the devs have been stating their intentions as. They explicitly said giving a large inventory would make D2R feel not like d2.
they said allowing more charms would affect balance. which it would… which is the exact reason why the new added space cant be used for charms.
Any extra inventory will affect the decision of how many charms to use.
I almost never ran with max charms and cube, the QoL choice to use 2 less skillers was worth it. Those are the decisions the devs have repeatedly said they do not want to change.
Otherwise every single player will just use +13 all skills, all the time.
2 Likes