You might want to look in the mirror.
The method used here is VERY bad.
You are comparing a previous test to a new test and claiming equality. Using this mentality, you could claim that, because of having an income, low-income african-american families need no help because they make money now compared to when they were slaves.
You use an outlier to determine if something is good or bad. Medical companies have done this for years. Almost always, it results in lawsuits over them releasing a dangerous product.
You are using data with a HUGE skewing towards one part of the test. The first barb buff in a long time, a lot of people are going to play it. This increases the chance of an outlier happening.
You show information from only one part of the current test versus all the numbers done on it. This would be considered a bias and invalid for proving something in the scientific community.
On top of that, someone showing that a SEASON clear is being done with a fraction of the effort needed for NON-SEASON clear indicates a very strong build. Since it takes extreme NON-SEASON paragon (10000+) to match what a SEASON (~5500) paragon can do, it indicates a strong disparity. Have someone who has similar (<1% difference) paragon doing each and their numbers and then you can have something more likely to be believed even though both are extreme examples.