i told you before on old topic , the new bet launcher will change anything , enigma need to be remove is bad for the class balance but also is the bot paradise armor ,
If there is a claim, its not enough to believ in it. You need actual evidence to not make poor decisions based on false claims.
But sure, if people cheat, they should be banned, sooner the better. I dont like ban waves strategy, its too slow and they let people cheat before they ban them.
Iâm surprised how people are trying to deny the existence of bots and map hack. Search Map Assist D2R and your first page of results will all contain derivatives of an existing free maphack for D2R.
Less openly shared are bots. There are multiple kinds, the simple version uses pixel or image detection. Upload pictures of what you want it to click on and program a sequence of events and bam you have your pindle bot. These existed very early in the release and are partially responsible for the queue system, of course Blizz will never reveal that. There was a known ban wave against at least one pindle bot about 1 month after release.
The more sophisticated bots are the packet bots, they work more or less like the bots of D2 LoD, and can usually be detected by Blizzard, but they are much better, as they can read everything in the game via memory and network transactions rather than relying on what is currently on the screen. This is an oversimplification, as I donât know much more about how they work. But Iâve seen the proof of their existence. These are much harder to find evidence of, but there are short videos shared every now and then.
At this point I donât care. Iâm not going to provide the evidence you seek and waste anymore of my time.
The claim logic that youâre going by is based on the extraordinary claims that usually targets a specific individual or a group related to crime offense or claims that could have significant impact to large audience based on the outcome. Not all claims require proof and if youâre from US and Canada, it isnât required by the law. What Iâm discussing here is that Iâve witnessed many cheaters and Blizzard needs to do something about them. Similarly, if I witness a crime, I call the police and then provide them with the information of what I believe occurred. Going by your logic, if I canât provide the police evidence such as a video recording or dna samples, my claim should be ignored and all such similar events should be ignored as well.
evidence is d2jsp , itemnow . com or one of the other bot sites where nerds spend money on digital pixels. Or just log into battlenet and play for a while and see for yourself the spam bots are everywhere
Its not evidence of botting lol. Sem this is what i am talking about. People do all kind of claims but reality is that they say stuff like this making wromg assumption without evidence. Explain to me how is item selling site proof of boting please.
If i open my own selling site and start selling my items, that means i am bot user? Its nonsense dude. Why do you assume they use bots?
Yes, Iâve reported some but not every single case. If you look at the first post, the purpose of this post was made in hopes that Blizzard would take action to start a new banwave before the ladder. Similarly how people are asking for qol updates or balance changes.
Yes but that is the role of the police to gather the evidence. As a witness, he/she is not required to provide evidence on behalf of the police but is sometimes required to assist with the investigation if needed.
Let me give you some other claim examples directly related to D2R:
Most of my items vanished. Can Blizzard fix the issue from occurring again? Based on your logic, this never happened unless the person was recording.
Player counts are half as what it used to be. Based on your logic, if a person doesnât have direct access to Blizzard database of actual player count, none of this is true.
My level 95 HC character died due to slow loading screen. Based on your logic, this never happened unless the person was recording.
Anyways I hope you get the point.
Edit: Also if you want to get technical, here are some of your claims w/o any evidence. I think itâs absurb that I have to point these out. I donât think you need evidences for any of them but apparently, you should according to you.