[Classic] The Shared Stash

I usually lurk, but this is so important… Please fix this.
Anything helps. Right now we can’t even see eachother’s games.
Could we have a better public game listing? if that’s to much to ask at least please give us a better stash system, otherwise our account is full of blank characters again for muling. This wasn’t a purist nostalgic feeling. We would like the QoL of stash too. I’m glad this is getting attention. I urge anyone seeing this to also chime in and support.

3 Likes

I can see all the games on the list due to the setup of my computers and NOBODY is playing classic HC right now… @spiffy you could have magic wings and still not be in a game.

1 Like

For sure you will o_O

You need to look out because WickedArcher will say to pay micro-transaction crap to Blizz because he doesn’t think and trolling.

Trolls live in caves… go there !!!

Still no HC classic games active on any NA regions.

so you didn’t see my game “wickedarcherisfat”

You didnt make it on NA…try logging into NA and making it… I can see all areas of NA nice try troll

I was playing on EU for 2h and I saw a few games + mine.

Go away Troll

Well, im waiting for ladder.

I usually make a classic char to play leisurely on my own and/or a 2nd classic char to help rush my friends through HC without needing ancients or bumpers to get them back into Hell.

Definitely need the stash update

p.s daily bump

1 Like

The problem with space is not because there isn’t enough space, it’s because people have a hoarding problem.

Its not so much about space as it is about muling gear from one char to the next.

2 Likes

It would be nice to have the added stash space in the classic game. However, we all know that if Blizz fulfills that one request there will be an avalanche of additional QoL requests for classic. If they are willing to bring additional space to classic, for both online and off-line, without breaking the game, then its fine with me.

Examples of breaking the game:

  • disabling/removing TCP/IP (online/off-line)
  • forcing IPv6 for TCP/IP (online/off-line)
  • disabling/removing the /p8 feature in off-line
  • adding some retarded anti-cheat feature to classic that completely disables mods in off-line mode (yes I know mods are frowned upon in the classic game)

The above is not an exhaustive list.

i could live with small space, but the share function is so much QoL

1 Like

Idiot. Classic = Non-Expansion. Stop posting these responses in D2R forum.

The excuse of keeping the game original has gone out the door now that your changing cooldown timers and skill synergies etc. Just give us the damn stash already. Stop making poor excuses. We should have had it from the start.

3 Likes

Any update on the shared stash for classic? The keeping the game the same excuse went out the window with patch 2.4. Lots of things will be changed. Give classic the larger stash and more importantly, the shared stash. This topic has lots of support, Blizzard should listen.

4 Likes

Follow the rules for social contact… no consent means no permission.

Damn this post is still alive and they won’t even give us a shared stash.

3 Likes

Why wasnt it there in the first place

With that mindset they should have left the graphics legacy for classic

1 Like

They don’t have any mindset.

The reason is simple, they didn’t react to our voice since the beta test or close to the release date.

1 Like

I see you that are at a loss of the ability to have civil discourse without resorting to name calling. Also, you seem to not read what I wrote in its entirety or you suffer from low reading comprehension. If you read the entirety of what I wrote and fully understood it, then you would know that I’m in support of bringing more stash space to classic, but without breaking the game as I described. Classic and D2-LoD have the IPv4 LAN feature. I don’t want LAN removed or altered. Also, what is the distinction between D2R and D2-LoD (aka v1.14D) so that I can get that straight. In my mind classic was pre-D2R, but please inform me and everyone else. All that I require is a straight answer. No need for name calling.