Hi, title.
So, again, Zovaal dominated BOTH Arthas and Sylvanas.
Arthas was already fighting for control with Ner’zhul due to the Helm of Domination.
Frostmourne, in Wrath, might have claimed Arthas’ soul, and would appear to be the item by which Zovaal was doing his best to force Arthas to do what Zovaal wanted him to do?
The problem here is that possibly among the retcons to Wrath, the item itself may have had text changed. I played during Wrath. I thought I recall a GM wearing a Frostmourne, and the item’s text mentioned something about the wielder “losing” their soul.
As for Sylvanas, the game most likely has Sylvanas manipulated into working for Zovaal, after he lies to her and claims he is asking her to help him, “Fight the system.”
So, here’s the problem:
- Sylvanas: lied to. This is a form of manipulation.
- Arthas: Zovaal appears to be trying to use mental domination through Frostmourne.
And…
- Sylvanas is to be redeemed.
- Arthas, however, is to be condemned.
While not direct parallels… Both of these two are not entirely responsible for their actions.
Arthas may have done at least some of what he did because there was as nagging voice in his head always trying to get him to most likely kill as many people as possible.
Sylvanas however was convinced, after Zovaal lied to her, that he wanted to fix Creation as it was in his eyes.
So, for those wondering, the why for this thread:
- If an NPC were actively fighting a player’s toon for control of their own agency, or, was able to, “take over,” the RL player’s input, every single second of all the time said person is trying to play their toon in game…
I think most would unsub, especially if they never chose to sign up for this hardship.
And yet, here we are in the story, with two different NPC’s, both presumed to be full individuals, in the story, that each were manipulated, at least in different ways…
Towards the same result.
While supposedly having two opposite narratives forced upon us in reference to each.
- Sylvanas is to be redeemed. She never had full agency.
- Arthas is to be condemned. He never had full agency.
…
Blizzard?
Please explain.
Edit: added a part above in regards to Frostmourne. The item’s text may have changed since Wrath.