Your Lore Hot-Takes

Not everything has to be gray, Absolute good and absolute evil should be part of the story as well.

5 Likes

Xusho, why you speaking to my heart so much?

Stahpit, it’s creepy.

Gotcha gotcha. That makes sense. Their immortality also included immunity to diseases as well which I believe was unique to them as I think other elves could get sick.

1 Like

The Quel’dorei were never meant to have a lifespan past about a thousand years, which is a stupid long time, in human terms, but not in terms of the Kaldorei who have lived ten times that. That only got murky in BFA because of that silly guy we do not talk about because he should not exist.

The Shen’dralar retained immortality but at a terrible cost. Most of the Highborne of Eldre’Thalas were murdered for a small handful to survive, and their prince went increasingly mad. Eventually most of their city fell to ruin and the few survivors were forced to flee into the jungles of Feralas with little more than the clothes on their backs when the Horde purged what few that remained from the ruins of Dire Maul. They were decidedly not a happy ending sort of story.

Hot Take: The blessings that made the Kaldorei impervious to disease and poison were far more valuable than that of timelessness. They were guaranteed a long and unnaturally healthy life which only extreme violence could end. Those blessings should be the ones they seek to regain by far.

3 Likes

ShadowlandS was the greatest expansion story and lore-wise, and NOTHING they ever do or write in future will as good as SL. Also im pretty sure that the implications of SL story has went over the heads of like 90% players. Like SL don’t care for your mortal fantasies about “good” or “evil”, - the only truth - every soul has purpose. For kyrian purpose - is servitude. Half of the Kirians is actually ether servants of Old Gods in live, or of Burning Legion. In introductory quest into Kyrian covenant is PC helping old servant of Burning Legion to forget, but most ppl somehow missed it out.

Illidan was better as a villain and Buring Crusader was a logical way to end the character that was introduced in WC3.

Xe’ra did nothing wrong(not the meme, I actually mean it) and Illidan is a massive hypocrite given the Illidari’s philosophy is all about making any sacrifice to defeat the Legion.

Garrosh didn’t deserve the villain bat. The few positive moments with him like Stonetalon Mountains shows what he should’ve been turned into.

Jaina should’ve died at Theramore and her role post-Cata taken by a new charcater.

Not sure if it’s a hot take, but Mists of Pandaria had one of the best overall stories of any expansion, its only weak point being of course, when it touched the faction conflict.

The Iron Horde were actually good villains and shouldn’t have been suddenly usurped by the Legion at the last second.

We don’t need the Titans and Light made soft-evil or morally ambiguous to the extent the story appears to be moving, let some of the “big good” factions remain that.

The faction conflict has always been the weakest part of WoW’s lore, the recent attempts have just been worse than it was from vanilla-Wrath.

While dying a villain was certainly a logical way to take her character, Sylvanas could’ve just as easily taken a different path based on both the Legion introduction and the stated reason the Forsaken took their dark path.

Vol’jin is cool, but a little overrated and shouldn’t have been made Warchief.

Gul’dan is one of Warcraft’s best villains because he’s evil because he’s an awful person.

Bolvar should’ve been the secondary villain of Shadowlands and would’ve made more sense than Sylvanas.

The Alliance started both wars with the Horde, the writers just ignore that fact.

The only issue with Thrall post-Cata is he refused to return to the Horde, but the idea of him putting aside the name Thrall in favor of Go’el was actually good character development for him.

The Alliance needs more infighting between its members.

Moira should get the villain bat next. It makes more sense with how she was introduced than what she’s turned into, especially during Blood in the Snow.

1 Like

Blizzard is hit-and-miss (more misses than hits) when they do grey.

I’m glad somebody said it.

TBC had extremely good concepts and worldbuilding but the story writing was terrible.
Like, irredeemably bad.
The kind of bad that screws over all future story elements going forward.
The kind of bad storytelling that lands both Draenei and Blood Elves with no actual goals or anything to do going forward until Blizz decided on writing up new stuff for them to do retroactively.

Yrel is a way better and more compelling character than Velen ever pretended to be.

3 Likes

Maybe there’s a correlation between these two. A warmongering orcish Horde led by a Hellscream would probably have been more compelling expansion antagonists had Blizzard not done two of them back-to-back.

4 Likes

Making NPCs named “[x zone] Visitor” as a bandaid for your story doesn’t retroactively make it good or consistent with the greater themes or the race nor address the core problem with a race’s capital being on the opposite end of the world from their actual lands.

2 Likes

My hot take is the criticism that Dragonflight is Disneyfied and too peaceful is more to with the fact that the hivemind doesn’t understand what a consistent theme looks like. Dragonflight IS more World of Peacecraft but that’s a deliberate stylistic choice for the expansion and I will bet my left nut that it won’t be the case in the next three. It’s a consistent theme in a Warcraft story - we should be celebrating, not whining. Seeing the Blue dragonflight reunited alone was worth the entry price.

2 Likes

Seeing someone with the name Grimdark fighting against people calling DF “Disneyfied” legitimately makes me smile.

4 Likes

I think the problem is that it is dependent upon prior things for that theme, and said things just don’t support it at all. And WoW is one continuous game with frequent updates, not something like Elder Scroll’s where there’s a good amount of years between all of them to make sense of stylistic differences (but even then they’re at least somewhat more consistent thematically).

Pandaria got flack out of this dumb idea that Pandaren were new. But it’s story, in my opinion, approached these ideas way more rationally. Whereas DF is so fixated on it’s own narrative that it ends up depicting cultural displacement and diasporas as “healing” lol.

1 Like

Night elf immortality does affect it with Tyrande slowly getting wrinkles now that they have lost it.

Which is why AU Blackhand stood out so well. One of the best antagonists in WoD for what little screentime he had.

Also his boss fight is one of the best in WoW history for end of raid bosses.

It is a real shame that the false meme of MoP being “Kung Fu Panda” became a thing.

  1. The movie rocks. One of Dreamworks best
  2. Panderan existed as lore characters long before MoP. Thanks of Chen Stormstout in WC3: TFT. Who was all about that drunken fist martial arts all the way back then.

It does annoy me when people use memes as criticism (see Green Jesus as another example) but when you point out its wrong, they just go, “It’s just a meme, stop being so serious”. Even though everyone knows that it was more than just “a joke”.

People act like Pandaren had barely anything to them prior to MoP.

In the Warcraft RPG (the main source for lore at this point in Warcraft’s history), prior to the creation of WoW… There was more lore written for the Pandaren than there was for the Forsaken.

Not even kidding, look at the book Alliance & Horde Compendium (I think it’s that one), Pandaren get a full 5 pages of lore on them… Forsaken? One. One full page and a paragraph.

1 Like

Hell, Chen even mentioned he was from Pandaria back in WC3: TFT. Obviously this would be later retconned with the Lei Lei comics but the concept of Pandaria did exist back then as well.

To which people will of course say, “they were an April fools joke, reeee”

To that I say, “So was a dungeon needing a light source to progress. We ended up getting that somewhat with Vault of the Wardens in Legion”.

1 Like

Yeah, the criticism behind Pandaren being added has always been pretty dumb.

‘April Fools Joke’ yet they had more dedicated lore to them in the Warcraft 3 era than one of the races that would eventually become playable in WoW lol.

Never understood that criticism, it isn’t like Pandaren don’t fit into Warcraft’s universe. If anything, they’re as encoded into Warcraft’s DNA as Tauren or Blood Elves.

MoP being King Fu Panda was sorta just the first incarnation of “Dragonflight is all Disney”, which is to say, its themes and style were markedly different from bog standard western high fantasy and some people dislike change.

3 Likes

Kind of makes me wonder if Kalimdor came out in a WoW expansion we’d see the same kind of criticism against it lol.