“Amoral” characters are just good or evil with commitment issues (usually leaning towards the latter since they tend to be selfish).
There was a time when Sylvanas wasn’t evil, and that time is past, especially since chacters whose crimes come nowhere near Sylvanas’ have been written off as bad guys and executed.
It’s sad that at the meta level, morality in the Warcraft universe often boils down to “Do I like this character? Yes; they’re good. No; they’re evil.”
I always have a little sigh of relief when I don’t see my little avatar among the posters in these Necro’d threads. Like :“somehow I avoided this dumpster fire back in the day….”
It’s true. The Sylvanas I fell in love with (that merciless, badass and inspiring “battleangel”) will never come back. And yet… Lordaeron belongs to the Forsaken, now and forever!
They matter in so far that the New Sylvanas is just a fusion of her evil and good side being whole again. She even mentions the cinematic where Uther helps her that she’s still very much responsible for the actions that her other half did.
Just because she got her good side back, doesn’t mean the old points are suddenly invalid.
The hero taking responsibility for actions that other’s wouldn’t is a common heroic trope. It’s the same as Anduin feeling responsible for the things he did.
And I’m sure it will matter to the degree they keep with these attitudes, but, in the end, she is a new person and old personality doesn’t matter.