There are a number of people who truly don’t believe boosting will matter on the botting scene. And some people who question whether it will. I fall into the latter category. I accept the possibility it will matter, but there seems to be more evidence to the contrary.
The argument being made by people who say it won’t matter is that, for the price of a single boost, you could create four accounts and pay gold to mages to boost those four accounts to 58 instead. And that, long-term, it’s the better play.
He’s the math / logic:
If you get mages to boost you to lvl 58, it’ll take approximately 2k gold per character and cost 8 days of RL time (48 hours /played to get boosted to 58, 6 hours of being boosted a day, 8 days).
So, a botter who pay-boosts to 58 effectively gets 8k gold (2k X 4 characters) and 8 days of gold farming over a botter who pays a mage to boost his chars instead. But the one who paid a mage gets 4 accounts instead of just one.
Fast forward to THREE days later. (Eleven days after the accounts were created) The four accounts each got in three days of gold farming. That’s 12 days of gold farming total. (3 days X 4 accounts = 12 days). The guy who boosted to 58 got in 11 days of gold farming total. (The 8 days the other accounts were leveling and the same three days they were all farming).
The account that got boosted to 58 is now an entire day behind in terms of gold farming. But is still up 8k worth of gold. (that paid to the mages) Assuming (As the OP said) a gold farming bot farms gold for 3 hours a day and makes (My guess) 200 gold an hour in TBC. If that’s true, you’re talking 600 gold a day per account. So the boosted character only has a 7400 gold lead now.
Every day that goes on past that point, that gold lead diminishes by 1800. (1 account per botter cancels each other out, the other 3 accounts gain). After another 4.10 days, the two accounts are even.
FIFTEEN DAYS after the accounts are created is the break even point. If botting accounts survive longer than 15 days then it is more advantageous for a botter to create four accounts and pay a mage to boost them then it is to pay for a 58 boost.
–
That’s the logic. The one flaw is that it’s being made “in a bubble” so to speak. There may come a point when a botter CANNOT create more accounts (due to hardware limitations). They can only run so many per computer after all. If that’s the case, the 58 boost will get new accounts on the scene quicker.
It also doesn’t factor in botter laziness and assumes they care / understand about maximizing profits in that regard.
–
But back to the “It won’t matter” argument. The entire debate is based on a botter leveling up a new account. That’s mostly going to occur when an existing account gets banned. The general consensus is that blizzard doesn’t ban accounts fast enough (I get the impression we’re talking 3-4 months)
If that’s the case, then boosting isn’t going to really matter anyway as the accounts are already 70 for long periods of time.
It’s not like new accounts are going to be created because the boosts exist. So there aren’t going to be any more botters than you had before. If anything you will have faster recovery when an account gets banned but FEWER overall bot accounts.