Yeah?
There sure are a lot of us who “hate him for no reason.”
I wonder why that is.
Must be a reason.
7 Likes
I should qualify my statement. They’re Crazy Far Left Progressive sites. I won’t argue the point. If it has feathers, webbed feet, and quacks it’s not a dog no matter what anyone says.
Uh. Okay. We need to figure a few things out. A Jeffersonian Liberal would be pro-capitlism and pro-police a la the thin blue line argument. The same applies for Equal Protection Under the Law. That’s a Classical Principled Liberal. You could also call it Enlightenment Liberalism. That’s what I’m in favor of, although on political personality tests, I wind up as a Centrist. Which, by the way is slightly to the Right of Classical Liberalism.
As far as economic vs progressive liberalism, I would argue that it’s all the same grift these days. And it is a grift. There’s no honesty or common good to be promoted within any of it.
I think you’re entitled to your opinion? But I oppose a “Death Tax” or anything that contravenes an individuals decision on how to dispose of their wealth. If they create the value that comes from their own labor and creativity, then taking it from them is theft. If you force them to labor or create without compensation, that is slavery. Like it or not, Capitalism is the best system we have, even if it’s not perfect.
I would argue that Libertarian/Authoritarian is a separate axis. Of course, if you go too far in one direction or the other, you’re going to have a strict Authoritarian State regardless whether it’s Hardline Communist or Extremely Fascistic. There’s a thing called “Horseshoe Theory” that addresses this. I happen to be a “Minarchist”. I don’t want Anarchy, just enough government to provide basic services and a common defense.
From what I’ve seen, the “Uniparty Establishment” and the “Progressive Far Left” don’t want an overthrow, just Power. Personally, I don’t want collapse and overthrow either, but I do think reform is long overdue. The Trumanite Bureaucracy cannot continue flouting the Constitution and the traditional Madisonian Houses of Government for much longer without risking collapse or a darker period of violence than we’re seeing now.
No, I am not calling that for expressing his views. I am calling him that because he goes out of his way to be nasty human being.
Here is a prime example:
How is this anything but nasty?
6 Likes
Since when is the loud opinion valid over critical thinking? Theoretically it’s people hating him on a completely subjective bias.
It’s the same thing as people are going to cry “NERF NERF” on forums because X class owned them and they have no clue beyond the fact that they got owned, so they go and cry about nerfs.
It’s ignorant, subjective opinion that does not DEFINE someone as a bad person.
The end.
So I suppose 90% of people with pronouns and rainbow flags on internet are nasty people by your definitions, because all I see are them literally insulting everyone who does not agree with them on even trivial matters? It’s factual and true and you just gave it a definition to the boot.
1 Like
Yes, anyone who insults others is a dbag.
Glad we cleared that up.
2 Likes
What about harmless sarcasm? Does it come off as insulting to you?
Harmless sarcasm? Are you serious?
I think we are done now. There is nothing harmless about making a joke at the expense of someone violently attacked. Nothing.
1 Like
Since Reagan. Where have you been?
That is generally why we hate people, yes.
Yeah, I never understood that, but I don’t PvP or do group content. I just level alts belonging to every class. So I’d prefer they didn’t nerf anything, ever.
That’s generally what opinions are. That’s why they aren’t facts, but opinions. Because we know they are subjective and can’t be empirically proven, but we feel that way anyway.
It doesn’t do anything to him, but each of us defines him for ourselves however we choose, and since I don’t like his opinions, I look at him as a bad person. 
I assure you, if he knew anything about me, the feeling would be mutual.
Picking on your peers and throwing dirt at them like a bunch of primitive beings has become increasingly more popular in the society. I feel like someone is going to restart this simulation soon and we’re gonna be yet another evolutionary cul-de-sac like the civilizations before us.
Why do we even have to resort to such shallow-minded arguments if we could instead pursue a deeper meaning/goal is what I will never understand.
Enjoy it while it lasts I guess. Peace out.
Buckle up, it’s going to get much worse in the coming decade.
It is frequently restarted. That’s why the Berenstein Bears are now the Berenstain Bears and, allegedly, always have been. Version updates. The simulation doesn’t “start over,” it just reboots. On days when things feel different and you can’t put your finger on why, you know you’re living in a freshly patched reality. Unfortunately, life’s devs leave much to be desired.
Well, of course. We’re just the Roman Empire Sequel at the beginning of its catastrophic collapse.
Because we are apes, and none of our posturing and make-believe can change that. Our species is wired to fling poop when we’re angry, and though the best of us can master ourselves well enough not to, we can’t participate in public discourse without getting nailed in the face with a steaming pile of primate dung.
That’s what we’ve been doing all along.
1 Like
Xena 100% …
I still don’t know what makes him bad. Why is he bad? Because he is pro trump or something?
I was misquoted.
Legend of the seeker. I always had a crush on:
Its his actions. There are many on that side of the political spectrum that I never consider DB’s. Because they dont act like DB’s. Sorbo, Chachi and Cain are openly proud DB’s.
1 Like
Xena all day. herc desided to just be a drunk uncle on facebook.
1 Like
Before Laura Croft, we had Xena. WARRIOR PRINCESS!!!
I’m pretty gay, so, Hercules.
Xena. Sorbo is a right git.
1 Like