Question for ppl with high end PC playing WoW (aka 13900k/7800x3d with 4090). What is your frame rate like in packed events like soup or siege on dragon keep?
2 Likes
5800x3d + 3080
If I crank everything to max, during large events it can dip downwards to the low 40s. On average I’ll sit above 60fps.
Until those who have the 7800x3d report back you can expect roughly 10+fps to the minimum above the 5800x3d
30-40FPS on world boss with 100+ players using my 12900K + RTX 3080 Ti. Setting at Level 10 with 2560x1440.
Its more of a network bottleneck, or the server is struggling to feed data. My PC is yawning at the game.
4k, mostly max settings, RTX Off.
4090 RTX, 7950X3D, 32 GB 6000 MHz RAM.
Usually get at least 150-160 fps even in crowded raids/areas. Even Valdrakken usually sees no worse than 90 fps lows. Most of the time I’m cruising at my monitor refresh rate at 160 fps.
7800X3D with 3080ti at 4k x 1.7k (UWHD 1440p with render scale up)
Still drop to lows around 40 when in heaviest combat situations (e.g., team fight on the bridge in Ashran)
Ryzen 9 7900x
6000mhz CL30 Ram
Rtx 4090
4k resolution and max settings. RT OFF
On Area 52 in Valdrakken at a highly populated time 80-100+ FPS depending on what part of the city I’m in.
In world content like killing rares and on bosses in Mythics it’s rare when I dip below 70 FPS. But according to my 1% lows it does happen when fighting rares I just never notice it. It’s a very smooth gaming experience.
Im on 4k OLED. I probably have one of the best gaming experiences with this new rig then I have ever had. This goes across all games including AAA titles. It slayed Hogwarts.
How are you liking that chip? I almost got it because I use my computer for productivity when I’m not gaming so I need the cores. I’ve heard from people that have that chip that it’s kind of the best of both worlds. Because its a 7800x3D when gaming and a slightly slower 7950x when doing productivity.
I did the soup event on my new PC (7800X3D + 3080) and I never went under 60 fps with everything cranked minus ray tracing (off). I’m on a 1080p display temporarily though so it’s not the best example.
It’s good, but the AMD chipset drivers and the Motherboard Bio’s leave much to be desired (it’s bad).
Also boot times are longer compared to Intel because AMD and their partners havent figured out how to get high DDR5 Ram speeds to run stable.
It’s far better than my old 5950x was at gaming. Productivity is literally almost the same, minus 5 percent.
1 Like
It seems to be a thing with AMD. The first cycle or two on their new platform never does very well. It’s almost like it takes them 1-2 Generations to get everything working right on their new platform.
I think one of the main reasons Intel does so well on new platforms is because they’re so used to changing their platform every generation. (sarcastic humor here)
Actually you are not far off even though you were being sarcastic. One the complaints the mobo manufacturers had with the AMD 4 socket was how late they were getting things to the manufacturers and the need for a quick turn around. The board partners came out and said it had been so long since the AM3+ socket, about five or six years, AMD was acting as if they forgot how to prep the mobo manufacturers. So yes, Intel does a better job in prepping them because they change the socket every generation or two and give the mobo manufacturers plenty of time to work out issues as opposed to just dumping things on them and saying hey you are already behind in getting mobos ready to hit the launch date for the CPUs.
1 Like