Just letting you guys at Blizzard know I would happily double my sub fee to get classic plus. That is new content, progression on an Alternate WoW timeline that takes the story in a better direction with the classic/tbc design philosophy. Obviously exlcuding aspects of TBC that were divisive, like flying, welfare gear, ect. But there is money if you dare to care. I doubt I am the only one willing to put their money where their mouth is!
20 Likes
no
12 Likes
Well if they did do Classic+ you likely would be required to purchase the game for full price. So in a way you would already be paying for Classic+, no need to make the subscription to closer to $30 a month. They already making money hand over fist with subs + cash shops.
1 Like
And I’d unsub.
14 Likes
Honestly, most of the people I know are just now hitting 60, haven’t even dabbled in MC. I want to play classic first and relive the experience fully before ever even thinking about classic +.
5 Likes
You’re correct, you’re not.
Specifically: I would pay none of my sub fee (I would stop playing) if Blizzard changed the game in the ways you want.
And what happens if the Classic+ story isn’t better? What if it sucks? What then?
1 Like
You would have to pay a whole lot more than double to make up for all the people who would quit.
Doesn’t matter though we are going to TBC anyway.
2 Likes
To start, you screech the call of the #nOcHaNgEs people, then in the same breath, a month and a half after launch… make a thread asking for Classic+. The thing that people are asking for balance changes and new content for. A thing that CHANGES Classic. They already made it, it’s called TBC, and it was far FAR better then any Classic+ nonsense you’re on about.
Either the #nochanges community are piss poor trolls, or are incredibly dumb.
2 Likes
I’d pay triple to have Classic left alone.
100% support
It’s more likely that BC and Wrath comes out and then after that Vanilla/BC/Wrath + versions based on whatever is most popular - if any.
It might also rely on modern WoW pulling less subs than Classic. That would be interesting.
And until all the Classic Vanilla phases are out and then another 6~ months after that, there just isn’t any data currently on what the actual population of players who prefer Classic Vanilla will be.
At least by releasing BC/Wrath you have a bigger* group to work with IF Blizz goes forward with something. But no one (in the community) can agree on what + should be. QoL’ers turn off the vast amount of Vanilla players, nochanges do the same to QoL’ers. And very few players trust Blizzard.
Just the way I see it. But yes, in a (my) perfect world, the way Blizz did BC-BfA wouldn’t have happened.
honestly, if they were to add some “cut” content from classic, I don’t think too many people would be upset…
1 Like
Does TBC has the Emerald Dream (the scrapped one) as a new continent instead of an order hall like in Legion? 
I’d pay double for wraith, or burning crusade. Heck I’d pay 50 a month. Can’t wait till they come out, but for now classic will have to do.
1 Like
That’s okay because OP will pay double it offsets your sub cost.
Hopefully there’s enough of the OPs to offset everyone’s cost who quits because of that.
2 Likes
Good for you OP. Blizz is happy to know the whale population is as strong as ever. You want better gaming? Close your wallet.
Your mindset is why gaming is horrible today compared to 20 years ago.
Yea. Graphics have gotten better but quality gameplay has taken a huge hit.
It’s all about those cash shops for the whales to spend extra money in.
That’s why there’s such a huge push for legacy gaming. Today’s games focus on cash shops for the whales and not engaging gameplay.
1 Like
no, not me.
No, I might play it if they pay me though.
Double price? No.
Continued subscription? Yes.