This is correct.
5 Likes
You’re right. So take that out and put in the RDF that was actually in Wrath.
6 Likes
Nah, that one is terrible for the game too. You can play Retail if you want a Retail-style RDF tool like what was introduced during the ICC patch of Wrath.
I know you’re trolling, but RDF was in Wrath. It was used to run dungeons at max level.
It is NOT used to run max level dungeons in Retail. It’s all Mythics. What is used is this LFG tool they’ve added to Wrath in place of the authentic RDF. They’re literally turning Wrath into Retail by removing RDF and replacing it with this tool.
So you can keep trolling, and I’ll keep reporting them.
7 Likes
You can play Classic Era. Seriously, do you not realize how stupid that sounds?
Again, you can play Classic Era if you don’t.
It’s funny to me that these people have issue with RDF being in at launch (or at all, for that matter) because it wasn’t implemented until Patch 3.3, all the while welcoming the various changes such as Dual-Spec which didn’t come at launch, Death Knights being available in prepatch, etc.
12 Likes
Very well said. A rational person would take that whoopin and leave, let’s see what happens next.
3 Likes
I don’t want RDF in the game, but this post is grossly misinformed. The experience of the LFG tool in no way compares to RDF in terms of ease of use and priority ordering. RDF absolutely offers positive QoL improvements to the game; however, it’s the opinion of much of the player base (and seemingly Blizzard) that the benefits are not worth the downsides.
Whether or not any given person agrees that the downsides are, in fact, downsides is neither here is not really relevant to this thread. What is relevant is that spreading misinformation like this helps no one.
Where’s the proof that the majority of the playerbase doesn’t want it? The ACTUAL proof.
2 Likes
Why would someone who doesn’t want RDF play Classic Era? They can just play Classic Wrath because Classic Wrath doesn’t have RDF in it.
It’s those who want RDF in Classic Wrath that may want to consider looking elsewhere. They’re the ones that want the game to change.
Read what I wrote carefully. Let’s not lose sight of what the actual issue here is. This post is wrong and wherever you stand on the RDF issue, it should not be supported.
Because it’s not there?
We don’t know if this version of ‘Wrath’ will have it in or not.
I did read it, hence why I chose to reply. You said that it appears to be the opinion of much of the playerbase that the benefits are not worth the downsides. I then asked for any actual proof that this is actually the case.
2 Likes
But it’s also not in Classic Wrath? What part of that are you not getting?
What do you think this statement here means:
1 Like
They also didn’t plan to have classic servers period.
Plans change.
5 Likes
Lol, seriously? “We do not have plans to add it”? That’s your crutch to stand on?
2 Likes
You all are aware that like 80% of the appeal of these classic servers were to escape features like RDF right?
Right?
1 Like
Those two words mean different things.
It’s not even remotely the same… Well let me elaborate a bit more. This is not at all how it is working in lower levels. No more than 5 hours ago on my level 52 rogue I started a group and baby sat that LFG looking for 2.5 hours
Full group - I go to stone - As soon as I arrive at stone we notice that not a single other person was heading to the stone, tank leaves - Find tank - Healer is AFK then disconnects - tank leaves.
This went on forever I eventually gave up and started questing
6 Likes
100% of the appeal to Classic was the ability to play the game as it was.
“Much” would typically refer to “majority”
3 Likes
Classic Era is still there…
5 Likes
Plans change because billions of dollars are on the line. No such degree of intensity exists with RDF. Can we please not chuck all nuance out the window?
If by crutch you mean definitive answer, then yes, yes it is. Problem?
1 Like