Will Sylvanas return help or hurt the game?

We have many undead in the game you telling me they are fake too?

If the order were reversed, one would assume the supplementary details leading up to BFA would also have been changed.

3 Likes

The cool Sylvanas i liked pre-Legion doesn’t exist anymore. Like like Starcraft 1 Kerrigan. Its just a lookalike corpse with the old name taped on on it no matter how hard Blizzard tries to pretend it isn’t.

I hate redemption stories.

1 Like

I agree with this, but the redemption story wasn’t the problem. The cool pre-Legion Sylvanas was derailed by BfA if not before that, and the “redemption” is just the writers’ attempt to salvage something from that wreckage.

4 Likes

Because she’s … not dead?

News flash: most of what you’re complaining about here is part of how she was ruined by BfA and her fans don’t like it either. They’re hoping that she can get something to help her come back from that clustercluck of a story.

Metzen doesn’t voice Vol’jin. Dave Fennoy is the voice actor for that character.

8 Likes

She was killed by Arthas and raised as a banshee. Arthas kept her body around on the off chance that he could think of some new malice to do with it. When she regained her will she used her banshee ability to posess it.

1 Like

So, like…

Anduin says “Now is the time for the light to retake Lordaeron. We should strike while our naval fleet is decimated after legion. Also, I hate Sylvanas”

And Tyrande is all “Yeah. It’s not big deal that the reason we haven’t is because Darnassus’ would be a sitting duck.”

And then they do that and Tyrande is like “Noooo! Sylvanas! Why would u do everything we always said you would do if we ever attacked Undercity?!!!”

Yeah…

If you want to give Afrasiabi credit for not giving us that, ok.

Lmao, Tyrande didn’t care about Genn starting a conflict and willingly diverted her entire standing military to go attack Saurfang, any complaints about her being a moron in the hypothetical can be matched by what she actually did in canon.

7 Likes

Teldrassil should have been a “false flag” (we already have Dreadlords manipulating everything on a cosmic scale) that unfairly painted Sylvanas as the aggressor, because it’s Sylvanas and no one would believe her. She keeps getting forced to do increasingly worse things to survive and keep the Forsaken safe, then when the big reveal comes everyone has pie on their face.

I feel like there were a few breadcrumbs that were leading in that direction (Varimathras quotes in particular), but whatever. Mustache twirl away instead, queen.

9 Likes

Neat. Has a similar vibe to the Jailor is not the True Jailor theory.

It’s been a while, but honestly I like villainous Sylvanas as a character and the option to play as a Loyalist to the villain was much needed. We don’t all have to be good guys and the setting needs bad guys

Also… We basically got what you are suggesting, without the satisfying demonic scapegoat. The poor ranger general was separated from Sylvanas when her soul was sundered and what was left, the banshee queen was evil and irredeemable, and not the true Sylvanas :face_vomiting:

1 Like

That’s where we disagree. I think if WoW is going to live up to its marketing, then yes, we do all have to be good guys.

If one side is going to be “the bad guys,” the time to set it up that way was 2004. Not 2018.

9 Likes

Sylvanas was never one of the good guys, but she was also never “I’m going to feed souls to the Super Devil to grind into oblivion because I think it sucks I won’t get to be with Nathanos when we die.” That, and as has been pointed out, we already did the Warchief villain/Horde Finding Its Soul storyline.

Basically, taken with MoP and WoD in sum total, all they managed to convey is that most of the Horde is populated by inherently bloodthirsty savages who are just looking for an excuse and a bunch of spineless half-wits who will turn off their brains, drool, and watch on passively until someone from the Alliance finger wags at them enough to join a rebellion.

4 Likes

Technically, she was striking a deal with Helya which is Hypothetically part of the story that was to lead us down the road to Shadowlands.

Odyn traded his eye to Muehzala for the ability to see into the Shadowlands where he saw the Kyrian who totally existed secretly when they decided Odyn gave up his eye. Odyn told Helya to make Valkyr like the Kyrian he saw and Helya refused because she didn’t think it was fair to force people to be Valkyr. To make Helya do what he wanted, Odyn turned her into the first Valkyr this making her beholden to him. Realistically, I think this story got hit by the same confusion bat as other parts of the Shadowlands narrative and that really, Odyn traded his eye to Muehzala for domination magic and that’s how he turned Helya into a Valkyr and forced her to create the other Valkyr.

All that to say that this is another two sided narrative that is awesome. Odyn is NOT the good guy. Sylvanas wasn’t silly to think that Helya might be a similarly powerful, more like-minded ally. Sylvanas had information we didn’t have, from her Valkyr handmaidens.

It shouldn’t be a faction is the bad guys. But individual characters can be villainous. There’s whole villainous classes.

Okay, but when the leader of the faction is your villain, it’s hard if not impossible to escape the entire faction becoming villainous by association.

5 Likes

It’s tough. Making her faction leader is definitely part of that story, but it was not the best move from a design point… For the mmorpg

I don’t think that was the story that was intended.

I think it was “domination magic bad so I’m helping Helya and her allies break the wheel like the devs’ favorite Khaleesi” but in addition to Afrasiabi being marred by scandal and the backlash to WoT showing the marketing department that fans would not accept a “She did it for freedom and she’s actually not a bad guy despite Golden using the word “Genocide” which we know is unforgivable” explanation. So they said “She did it because she’s spiteful dumb and has a hole in her soul.”

Edit: To be fair, when they started writing this narrative, Danearys Targaryen was much more popular, the final two seasons of GoT hadn’t come out and people weren’t yet fatigued of a crazy Khaleesi.

If you read the book. She thought she was making things better for everyone. “I will set us all free”. She even felt that NEs in Teldrasil would be better off in the end. (Loosing the remaining years of life, but gaining an eternity in a better afterlife).

Was that delusional? Yes. Evil and selfish? Not so much.

The souls in The Maw that were getting deleted from existence to fuel Zovaal’s efforts? Kinda hard to experienced better when you don’t exist.