Why LGBT Representation matters

Nike sales skyrocketed briefly because idiots bought overpriced sneakers just because Nike had a promotion with Kaepernick. That’s the sad thing. I really wish I was exaggerating how dumb people are, at times it actually feels like I’m giving these people too much credit when they end up dumber than the already low bar of expectation I set for them.

Azeroth is gay now

Do Titans experience such mortal feelings tho

The whole sneaker market is a wonder. But that is the power of advertisement and child slavery/cheap labor in foreign countries. But in capitalism someone has to suffer for people to be happy.

Anything is possible in Blizzards writing.

1 Like

Sweet, I’ll look out for it then

2 Likes

LGBT people are ridiculous. I mean we parade you around the country every year, but is that not enough attention? Nope, they don’t want recognition, they want to shove their ideas down your throat. It’s pretty clear and people are getting tired of it invading their personal lives. This has nothing to do with “Representation”, because the lGBT community is adequately represented, in fact they are over represented. Now it’s just a campaign to invade your personal lives and influence your children. It’s gotta stop.

1 Like

I think your point is that anything a corporation does is done with profit and marketing in mind. If I got that right, I basically agree with you.

Question for you, though; How is including LGBT storylines into the game any different then any other romantic pair?

Because from my point of view, excluding LGBT storylines being rare, they’re all just romantic subplots with very little weight in the overall storyline.

1 Like

Yeah i hate all the heterosexual romance that’s shoved down my throat. Like, I’m watching an action movie and the guy and the girl kiss? What’s up with that? I wanted to watch people kill monsters, not have those ideals invading my personal life. Think of the children! Did they want to watch vision and Wanda kiss in avengers? They’re really imposing heterosexuality on them.

3 Likes

It’s pretty straightforward. They’re shoes that people buy because of the marketing associated with the shoes, not the shoes themselves. People buy overpriced shoes because of the marketing alone. Very few actually buy shoes because they’re good shoes they enjoy wearing.

No, just the power of advertisement. Child labor has literally nothing to do with the marketing campaigns and just serves to further pad a bottom line by cutting down on costs. However, I don’t want to ask what kind of phone you have but if it’s an iPhone, never talk about child exploitation again. Additionally if your shoes are made in China, never talk about it again.

So people who you claim to be supportive of having representation because it might have a positive impact for them end up suffering playing WoW. Someone suffered so you can feel good there’s LGBT representation in the game.

You’re a sociopath and I imagine if you could quit dislocating your shoulder patting yourself on the back because you’re encouraging what amounts to false and predatory representation in a video game you’d be able to address precisely what it is you are saying.

They would cancel as not being supportive. It happens all the time across all spectrums. How about RINOs? :slight_smile:

Heterosexuality is the continuity plan of the Human Race. You can’t have homosexuality, without first having heterosexuality, because the broader society of heterosexuals keep the homosexual community population positive. Queer women don’t understand this, because they are lost in the feminist movement. But homosexual men do understand this, which is why they support straight men, first and foremost.

Why are we showing children that?

Ah yes, the “is it the gay chicken or the gay egg” quandary

you’re boring me

i think this might actually be the most ignorant thing I’ve ever read on here

2 Likes

I’m good with there being more LGBT representation in stories, at least where the writing and character design don’t suffer from it.

The last thing I want to see is discrimination based on sexual preferences. I certainly don’t like to see people get hurt over it.

What I don’t like about the LGBT community?

-Petulant “ambassadors” that lose sight of what they are fighting for (acceptance) and spend their time crusading and hating on heterosexuals and assuming everyone who implies a hint of negativity about the movement is a bigot

-People that say “breeders”

-People that spam threads trying to make certain characters in the game gay

There are people that represent the LGBT community that are just as awful and terrible as some of the people against it.

And it makes me sad.

Edit: because someone asked, I’m totally against homophobia too. I would have thought that was obvious when I said I don’t like to see discrimination based on sexual preferences at all

I mean really, it shouldn’t even be seen of as an us against them kind of thing. These aren’t factions, they aren’t sides. They are literally just differences in what genders people prefer their bedmates to be.

It really feels like because heterosexuals for a long while saw homosexuality as abnormal and weird that now homosexuals have launched open war on anything heterosexual.

It’s like “Oh the waters are calming. . . well we can’t have that! Let’s stir the pot and make them hate us again!”

Ok but this is funny though :skull::skull::skull: like that’s the worst they got? strange that none of your bullet points are about homophobes tho

You can’t dislike them that much if you’re still using their platform.

Why would I include homophobes in what I dislike about the LGBT community? They aren’t part of it.

To be clear, I don’t like homophobes either.

You talked about discrimination based on preferences and didn’t specify :woman_shrugging: I tend to assume that means homophobia

Bruh what has happened to this thread i was just saying thank you to blizzard and a full on political debate happened

1 Like

You show kids heterosexual content, because that’s the normal societal paradigm, and it’s the proper content for developing children to see. Homosexuality should be a decision that an adult makes, not that a child makes. It’s the same reason we don’t teach children to do anything outside of the normal societal paradigm, because the broader society views people outside of that paradigm as outcasts, this is a paradox that has existed for thousands of years, and when they are outcast, they are more susceptible to depression and other very serious issues. They are not equipped to deal with societal rejection at a young age. Nor should society teach children to do something that makes their communities population negative. Queerdom in the world is a very small portion of the broader society, very very small portion. And it’s a good thing that it is a small portion, because it doesn’t affect our population so much, but we certainly don’t want it to either.

1 Like