Seems like an interesting choice that doesn’t make much sense…
4 Likes
There are several big titles that are not account wide. Maybe gating it to each character means driving alts to repeat the content. Or they assume all alts will do it anyway by default.
Hopefully not since that’s anti-warband.
2 Likes
Its a good question and their response to limiting certain reps doesn’t really ring true with me.
An example would be the winterpelt furbolg in DF. Its just a minor faction, what possible excuse is there for not making it for all my alts, rather than limiting it to one? I mean, if you consider it, every reputation was something a single character worked on for some reason; to say x cant be account wide because it was worked on by one character makes zero sense.
Sometimes I just don’t get their logic.
3 Likes
Warband is gold, gear, mounts, and materials. Warband has nothing to do with titles. Barely even has any achievements except making more characters lvl 80.
They make a lot of weird decisions that make no sense and run counter to what they say they intend.
2 Likes
Ya think? 
Lookin’ at you Mr Hazzikostas:
“At this point, we feel that outdoor gameplay in World of Warcraft is ultimately better without flying,” explained Hazzikostas. “We’re not going to be reintroducing the ability to fly in Draenor, and that’s kind of where we’re at going forward.”
2 Likes
obviously the immortal spelunker title is as prestigious as rank one gladiator titles.
No it isn’t.
Because your alt didnt clear t11 delves without dying. Undeserved.
Because you achieved it on THAT character. It’s a prestige title. Prestigious titles, including Hall of Fame and Gladiator titles, are character-specific.
2 Likes
what about the mythic plus rank 1 title? that is account wide.
hall of fame is not character specific; in fact, a person can get a normal cutting edge achieve, then later join a Hall of Fame guild for the same tier and that new person can use hall of fame title (even if they joined that guild three or four years after that tier ended).
Good point. Speculating, maybe because it’s usually a team effort, and many players have alts that would also be deserving of the 0.1% title if they afforded the time to it. Unlike PVP, it’s a competition against yourself in many respects.
I think this is more about the guild? Also, it’s more fair to players on the bench.
Personally, I never liked the Hall of Fame titles to begin with.
Deathless Delve might just be “you earned this on that toon,” and because it lacks external factors, it’s a show of skill on that character. I’m looking for ways to justify it, but not necessarily support it.
All good points on your end, though. 
The Faceless One was harder than no-death T11 yet that one is account wide.
Hyuck. 
Meanwhile, skyriding.
I think Ion suffers from a bad case of Iforgotisaidthat. Possibly self-induced.
2 Likes
Most likely, its a oversight. Something similar happened with the Mythic SoO title in Remix, and it was eventually hotfixed.
I’d take even a nemesis achievement player to a key before I’d consider a gladiator player. I want someone who at least has the semi promise of being able to do even basic mechanics over a PvPer whose going to be lost if there isn’t a pillar to run around
When it comes to questionably choices like this, i sometimes wonder if it’s a simple case of something being too difficult or time consuming for them for one reason or another, so they just think of some “honorable” reason for why they don’t want to do it, and that just becomes the narrative they push.
Kinda like how in WoD they wanted to remove flying so it would be easier to make content (and less of it), while still extracting the same engagement levels out of us, so they cook up this nonsense about immersion and whatever else, and then that just becomes the company line.
2 Likes