Why is Changing Covenants Seen As Betrayal?

https://media.mmo-champion.com/images/news/2020/july/leavingcovenant.jpg

https://media.mmo-champion.com/images/news/2020/july/rejoincovenant.jpg

Is there a reason why leaving a covenant is considered betrayal? They are all working towards the same goal, to save the Shadowlands from the Jailer and keep the afterlife functional.

What should they care if I’m beating Mawrats with Necromancy, vampire abilities or fairy stuff? What’s important is that we are all beating Mawrats and rescuing souls from the Maw, weakening the Jailer and saving the afterlife.

8 Likes

'cause they like, don’t really like eachother, and like, refuse to eat at the same lunch table.

2 Likes

I guess blizzard thinks of it like you’re working for mickeyDs then suddenly switching to work for burger king because of thier nuggies.

2 Likes

because you’re joining their fight.
You pledge yourself to fight for them.
With soulbinds you bind your soul with theirs.

And then one day you’re like “later fellas dont need you any more”

Of course its a betrayal

7 Likes

No, it isn’t. Parting ways is not betrayal.

If you quit your job for a new job that is more in line with your current goals and interests, you’re not betraying your old job.

4 Likes

I’ve felt the same way.

The restrictions proposed break rpg immersion and end up just punishing players needlessly.

2 Likes

Definition of betray from marriam webster
“to fail or desert especially in time of need”

I’d say leaving them counts as this

3 Likes

2 Likes

The covenants have the same overarching goal, but they’re still currently competing for what anima there is to help strengthen themselves.

I think abandoning one covenant for another could definitely be viewed as betrayal.

2 Likes

Details are sparce because of Beta and my unwillingness to look into spoilers, but consider how bad things have gotten in the Shadowlands right now. Souls are disappearing forever. The lack of anima is causing all kinds of havoc. For the Night Fae as one particilar example, their queen is having to choose what “lives” and what “dies” due to the lack thereof. Leaving your covenant to assist another in their acquisition of the same could be quite easily characterised as a betrayal in this light.

2 Likes

They’re on the same side technically, but the covenants are very independent places. They keep to themselves and their own purposes. No one but trusted members are allowed in their inner sanctums. With the anima drought they’re all desperate to preserve their own side first.

You promised to fight on their behalf as BFFs, earned their trust, knowledge and power, then abandoned it. Which shows your word means nothing so they aren’t going to forget it easily.

1 Like

You are definitely not failing them, and it’s not deserting if you’re leaving them to fight with their allies against the same enemy.

All covenants are in it together against the jailer, and an unrelated party picking a side to fight with then changing their mind can hardly be constructed as betrayal, unless the covenants are extremely petty.

3 Likes

its cause the covenant leaders are petty and they want to have the guy who saves everything on their team for the publicity

it’s like an office, everyone’s doing their own jobs, but they all secretly hate each other

1 Like

from what I’ve seen though they’re not really allies are they?

God even in another dimension we’re still beset with idiotic faction wars

1 Like

I think Rogues should be able to switch freely.

It’s written into the core of the class that all Rogues care about is the highest bidder. Their loyalty is buyable.

buyable loyality surely makes it less likely anyone would take you back

Unless you advertise up front as a mercenary for hire.

I never did any work for Garrosh though, not on any moral ground, he was just always bouncing checks.

I suspect for the same reason leaving a country is.

Except they’re the ones who need us. We can just switch to another covenant. They should be begging to have us come back.