Your own profile says your win / loss rate is no where near what you are proclaiming?
You;
Alterac Valley
172
98
56%
Arathi Basin
4
2
50%
Arathi Basin Comp Stomp
1
1
100%
Arathi Basin Winter
1
1
100%
Battle for Wintergrasp
4
1
25%
Classic Arathi Basin
113
59
52%
Classic Warsong Gulch
131
67
51%
Deepwind Gorge
128
64
50%
Eye of the Storm
110
64
58%
Isle of Conquest
165
126
76%
Seething Shore
29
19
65%
Silvershard Mines
113
60
53%
Strand of the Ancients
85
30
35%
Temple of Kotmogu
111
48
43%
The Battle for Gilneas
44
20
45%
Twin Peaks
107
44
41%
Warsong Gulch
11
3
27%
My Warrior Horde side
Alterac Valley
60
20
33%
Classic Warsong Gulch
321
158
49%
Classic Arathi Basin
196
115
58%
Eye of the Storm
197
123
62%
Strand of the Ancients
171
107
62%
Isle of Conquest
14
1
7%
Twin Peaks
198
108
54%
Silvershard Mines
172
101
58%
The Battle for Gilneas
192
113
58%
Temple of Kotmogu
168
96
57%
Deepwind Gorge
108
68
62%
Seething Shore
3
2
66%
1 Like
Wow that’s a lot of effort to put in for a necro
BTW those stats are lifetime btw.
1 Like
You haven’t pvped enough in BGs to even allow for a proper sample size… The most times you entered a BG was 22 times which was Twin Peaks 38% win rate.
You cannot use statistics to prove your Narrative when the sample size is so ridiculously low!
Play 100 games and lets see that %%%
1 Like
So what stats should we use? The ones you decide on?
Win rate is win rate
We can only use the Win rate stats from January to March during while mercury is in retrograde.
You can calculate to determine proper sample size. Would even 100 games be statistically adequate or would it over-sensitize the results?
It would be more feasible then 22
Possibly, but without calculating what an adequate sample size would be, anyone’s guess is as good as any. It may not even be statistically spot-on but it can be a good snapshot.
No, I agree, but a numerical even denomination based on 1%-100% win rate I would require at minimum 100 games?
Without including the other variables, 100 could be fair. If those stats were from the OP, I wonder how much changed since they made this 5 months ago.
It also includes WoD which Alliance had the advantage for most of the expansion, for instance. Also quits don’t count as losses either. I guess what I’m saying is there is no real reliable metric. While it’s fun to look at, using that as “reliable statistics relevant to the discussion” isn’t exactly a reliable source. I’m just saying.
It’s like saying we’re not in a heat wave because it was 40 degrees in 2006.
1 Like
Pretty ironic that there are few reliable metrics yet we get all this “data”. Data that can be tainted in all sorts of ways. Makes you wonder what value it adds.
2 Likes
I know for a fact that soloqueueing as Alliance at 120 is basically asking for punishment. Regardless of what others on the forum say about their personal win rates, I’m pretty sure if Blizzard were to release BFA only BG numbers, they would be something like 75%-25% in Horde favor.
I quit any BG’s about a month ago on all my toons.
5 Likes
Reflex is the most reliable.
3 Likes
Yeah there’s that but a lot of people probably don’t use it. The game itself needs to be better about it.
Okay but it’s still the best way to show how you do.
It even shows time stamps for those who fall back on afking to skew w/l ratios excuse. I just wish it showed solo or grouped so we could eliminate that excuse too.
1 Like
I do not believe the winrates are global as my Warrios has far more then my Priest which is my new main for this expac!
Whats up jugga, this is Shieldbash!
1 Like