I’m genuinely curious because outside of forum/website comment sections, literally no one is trying to defend Blizzard here. It’s not like politics where you have Fox News vs MSNBC and CNN on literally every single issue; there’s no big names taking the defense on this, at least from what I can find.
4 Likes
It’s their job to defend it. Maybe Chauvin’s lawyer would throw his hat in the ring.
if pepole there good , there gonna respect ,if defendit , u no there in SL hahahaha
ROFL.
Yeah…
I think.
these forums has been nothing but people who agree with each other argue for 2 days now.
1 Like
Based!
/char
This is blizzard they will always have white knights.
3 Likes
Some morons who liken it to fake Twitter outrage are the closest thing I’ve seen so far.
2 Likes
I’m not defending Blizzard but I refuse to jump on the train called “Court of Social Media.”
If they lose their trial? Fine. They’re a bunch of scumbags. If they win their trial? Fine again. The matter is over for me. At least I know they went through the proper channels to try to find the truth.
Twitter, Wowhead, a popular streamer, a news article that may or may not be biased, etc. is not a judge, jury and trial lawyers.
9 Likes
Agree with out on this. The only problem is the court of public opinion is demanding sentencing already.
You conveniently left out the fact that it’s been confirmed that instead of developing the product we paid for each month those people instead during work hours spent their time joking around playing games like call of duty all day and delegating the development to people not nearly as qualified hence the terrible quality of the game we have seen these past two expansions.
Regardless of your stance on the “Social justice” side of this, that one part about your sub money being wasted and not used to better the product you pay for should upset you unless you like throwing away your money.
12 Likes
Does someone need defending? As a knight errant, I shall defend the defenseless!
I am trying to defend this! En garde!
Oh. My names not big. Kind of long maybe.
sycophants.
I agree with this, the stupid part of all of this is that the quality of the product and service we all pay for has been terrible recently and now it’s obvious that the working environment could have affected things. We’re customers, we pay monthly for a product, and we rightfully expect that product to be a certain standard…
4 Likes
I highly doubt it will go that far. The lawyers will get together, make a deal and pay off the respective parties and have them sign a NDA.
I don’t think anyone is defending anything except a few trolls.
I thought they said they delegated to their work toward women? Not those who were unqualified. They just pushed most of their work onto female staff who in turn were overworked from their own job + the work pushed onto them.
Where are you getting unqualified?
NVM, He did. Well-- I’ll say we don’t know if they were or weren’t qualified to do the job.
This is what he said. That’s not what I read I the lawsuit. I read they delegated their duties to women who were also responsible for their own work.
Already changed my post.