So did she just randomly die from Arthas sword?
Sylvanas killed Calia when she (Sylv) betrayed the âGatheringâ Anduin created to unite the living and the undead of Lordaeron.
Strange it didnât say any of this on the wikia of calia.
Were you using wowwiki or wowpedia?
Because the answer to that will explain why
It has it on the Wiki with excerpts taken from the novel.
Grateful if someone with link privs can help.
You can link it yourself, just put ` before and after the link. e.g.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Wowpedia
Thank you
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Gathering_(event)
Iâm only on trust level 2 and I can do that.
I used to have level 3, but then i got reported for trolling for no reason.
Note that the ` key is the one left of the (1,!) key.
edit: The grave site is ingame just south of Newsteadâs farm house.
Itâs still a great novel to check out.
Sylvanas did. In the novel that came out for this expansion.
She was alive in legion as a follower for the priest order hall.
Actually, Sylvanas did not violate the terms of the gathering, Calia did when she stopped being impartial and started encouraging the forsaken to flee with her.
I certainly did not know that Arthas had a sister. I only started the franchise during BC.
Funny that Calia becoming undead is whats actually uniting the humans and undead
As someone said already sylvie killed calia at the ceasefire meeting as well as dozens of forsaken civilians.
The netherlight temples naruu raised her with some help from anduin and an undead priest named foul.
Its in the book before the storm.
No, Calia never violated any rule. There was no rule saying that Anduin was not allowed to bring people other than the family members of the Forsaken - just like Sylvanas brought her advisors.
The gathering was literally about Forsaken and Human family members meeting together and seeing if they could co-exist.
Sylvanas saw her power over the Forsaken at jeopardy, as she expected the humans to turn in horror at their loved ones as the old Alliance did.
However, because Calia was there, and encouraged the human family members to accept their loved ones, because they were still the same people, those Forsaken chose to defect to the Alliance.
Sylvanas could not allow that to happen. If that happened, then word would spread to the other Forsaken that the humans had changed, and some are willing to accept their family. If that happens - she loses all of her power over them.
As such, she had to stop it. She killed every Forsaken there except the ones she trusted, as well as Calia, because she saw Calia as a threat. She justified killing Calia to Anduin as Calia was not invited to the meeting, and as such, she justified it as killing a trespasser.
And all of this is backed up in 8.3, where we learn through implications that Sylvanas was mind controlling the Night Elves (they regret their actions, but refuse to return to the Alliance, believing the Alliance could never forgive them for what they did), but that the Dark Rangers were also under some sort of spell, as the majority of them, including the leader, have left Sylvanas and are guarding Orgrimmar from potential attacks by her.
Calia only encouraged the forsaken to run. After parque went to defect and sylvie murdured him.
The other forsaken sylvie murdured where mostly going back to sylvie as she cut them down. And those that where running to the alliance fort outside of parque where just trying to protect their living famalies that had accepted them.
I remember 3 undead sons trying to cary their elderly mother to safety. Only for her to loose her sons again. Thanks sylvie.
Parque should have waited. Sure. But if the forsaken are free and sylvie is not a tyrant. Then parque had every right to leave whenever he wanted. Without sylvie murdering him.

Actually, Sylvanas did not violate the terms of the gathering, Calia did when she stopped being impartial and started encouraging the forsaken to flee with her.
I agree in the respect that her acts broke the single day agreement that the Gathering was.
It was cruel in itself to expect the ruptured families would separate again. Goes without saying that is all she was trying to facilitate.
Either way I think it did end up turning for the better she died.
In terms of any sort of orders of violence that was all Sylvanas.

Sylvanas killed Calia when she (Sylv) betrayed the âGatheringâ Anduin created to unite the living and the undead of Lordaeron.
What this person is forgetting to mention is that Sylvanas agreed to the gathering between the Forsaken and the Human families because she knew the Humans would not accept the Forsaken, and that did happened. Most Forsaken were shunned and their Human families were disgusted by them. However, there were some who wanted to be stay together. Neither Anduin nor Sylvanas had the chance to talk this over thanks to Calia.
Calia was present at the meeting. She wanted to be a hero, the saviour of the Forsaken that nobody asked for. Calia makes a comment about the Lordaeron throne being rightfully hers, so itâs pretty clear her endgame was to cause some sort of uprising, and she does just that. She encourages the Forsaken to run away. Her Dark Rangers see this and they inform her immediately of the âdesertionâ. In fact, it was the Dark Rangers who told her that the Forsaken were defecting with Calia. She orders her Dark Rangers to kill every Forsaken and she personally flies down and kills Calia.
So it was really Calia who caused this mess. Anduin goes home moping and blaming himself for what happened (like usual), and Sylvanas gets closer to her Saturday morning cartoon villain persona Christie Golden decided to force onto the character.

Calia was present at the meeting. She wanted to be a hero, the saviour of the Forsaken that nobody asked for. Calia makes a comment about the Lordaeron throne being rightfully hers,
Nobody minus Parqual Fintall, the Felstone family and all the Forsaken then Sylvanas kills?
Also she is literally the daughter of King Menethil II.