I do not understand Era(n-1) But at least they could try. I’t not that expensive running two servers/xpac/area. I would gladly pay for Era + HC, TBC Era and Wrath Era,
(era(1-n), tbc(1-n) means that they set up a server number 1 for era 1 for tbc and 1 for wrath then a few month later everyone wants fresh server 2 for era, 2 for tbc, 2 for wrath then a few months later everyone wants fresh server 3 for era, 3 for tbc, 3 for wrath … then later everyone wants fresh server n for era, n for tbc, n for wrath.
And of course on each of the old ones, others are coming along more slowly and still want to keep the old servers.
That’s a lot of servers to maintain.
I think in this thread you’re the only one speaking of fresh servers. The rest of us ask for Era servers - that is permanent servers for each iteratioons, in all 6 servers per region. That’s not much.
No I’m not the only one. Personally I don’t care about fresh servers. I heard the request from others.
i think the issue with separate subs is the legality of charging twice for the same product since everything in era except the classic azeroth terrain, is available already in retail. likely their lawyers said it was iffy. not to mention classic players may be enticed to play retail
i would gladly pay a separate sub for permanent tbc and wrath servers
1 Like
True. Icast also mentions Fresh in this thread - so other, singular.
Please yes tbc server… my favorite :heart eyes:
4 Likes
“We think we want it, but we don’t!” 