Since rolling a Death Knight already requires no extra effort, just let me buy a 55>70 boost for my Death Knights. I just finished my (2) Level 79 Paladin twanks, might as well do (2) Level 79 Death Knight twanks since I’m not doing much with my (2) Level 80 Druids.
Honestly with how money hungry people claim blizzard is with the constant “P2W” complaints, very surprised that they limited boosts to one per account. Kind of blows a whole in the P2W theory to me as WoW is not one of those games.
Or if thier numbers go down enough they will need the money.
at some point team classic will work out why team retail’s purchase requests get approved more.
answer…even with easy as hell leveling they probably get a few million in boosts per month. Bean counters like to see you made say 20 million to then be more agreeable to a 2 million purchase request. still up 18 million off sales…and the 2 million was pitched probably to make even more profit. So an investement.
That is buying one 60 boost and one 70 boost they are entirely different products. The 60 boost is just a product no longer offered in order to keep to their limit of one per amount.
As such tbc never got a 2nd boost the tbc boost was removed from the shop and the wrath boost was added.
Technically each account has 1 type of lvl boost. A lvl 60 boost which was offered with the TBC upgrade bundle and a lvl 70 boost with the northrend upgrade. These character boosts are not the same because they go to different lvls. These boosts are not given they are offered as part of a bundle which gives it a different value as well.
While both sides are true; the key is that they are not the SAME TYPE, Now if you look at from the other view yes blizzard may or may not have lied if you generalize the boosts. Yes they are both character boosts period. So as the old saying goes; the devil is in the details.
Personally i think buyng lvl 70 boosts is good idea as it stands. The current phase and its content ( mainly tournamant grounds) is more or less pointless. Any equipment you get from the quartermasters are useless by the time you are able to buy them since you will have run enough heroics to buy gear that is already superior to what you have normally and do a raid for a weapon that will end up replacing what you get. I mean think about it it takes it takea minimum of 3 days to unlock your first quartermaster then another2 days to get enough seals to buy the cheapest item ( thats 10 seals and not including the mount) they have in their possession. Not to mention the new H+ mode makes that 200 gear even more pointless to obtain.
Personally I’m all for boost buying but don’t set up the characters with 200 gear across the board give like 187 gear that way they still have to hunt down the gear they need to raid and such. Another argument for not giving us boosts would be to give us RDF back so lvling isn’t so monotonous. earlier this week i spent nearly 5hrs in the group finder and posting in LFG chat looking for a group. Granted realms would go back into battle groups again but you get the point. At this point we don’t need a group finder that makes finding a group just as monotonous as lvl without dungeon group.
At this point RDF is a better alternative to selling boosts for players to lvl to Xlvl and have no idea how to play the game let alone the classes and mechanics of raids and dungeons.
Legal definitions aka terms of sales is vary clear on what is one item what is another.
It is not two boosts it is one level 60 boost and one level 70. The op is asking to buy a 2nd lvl 70 boost. Massively different than buying two tbc boosts (the line you are trying to refute and you never did). You never bought a 2nd tbc boost you bought an entirely new item with entirely new sales restrictions. Just like buying two different garbage cans (diff makers) is not restricted to a limit one on each garbage can as you never bought two of them there different products.
It’s not rocket science.
It’s not 1 plus 1 equal 2. Its x plus y equals x + y. Two different products can’t be added together to get a total purchase amount of one of the two. They are not the same. It’s like saying you bought 1 eatable apple plus 1 plastic apple so bought 2 apples (by sale restriction definition). You dint you bought two different products. No one in there right mind would consider them the same. Esp when trying to claim “I bought two before when limited so let me do it again” you never did before and you can’t now.