You’re killing me lol my guy
1 Like
thats murder, and im upset by that
After your campaign for RDF, will you also be campaigning for Arena teams to be brought back? Spell batching? Will you be asking them to remove the modern raid frames?
We don’t want truly authentic. Argue the merit of RDF without attaching that failed “authenticity first” philosophy that Blizzard was touting with Classic. It’s the same philosophy that had us logged off with world buffs for 85% of Classic.
1 Like
Like 2% of the player base is cheering. Then another few percent that dont care one way or another. But I would say 60-80% are very upset with it being removed
Im not saying this is the reason but it could be a reason why there isnt more anti-rdf threads. Blizzard has stated that theyre not putting RDF in Wrath. Why would the anti-rdf crowd make a bunch of threads or videos on why blizzard should remove rdf when they already stated that they’re removing it. Thr pro-rdf crowd has more of a reason to be up in arms and make threads or videos because they’re trying to get rdf put back into Wrath hemce why you see more of the pro crowd than the anti crowd. The anti crowd has nothing to fight for because its already been removed whereas the pro crowd has a ton to foght for trying to get it reimplimented
5 Likes
Lmao why would I advocate for things that weren’t in the original Wrath, everything I’ve said was in the original game.
My feedback is that’s a wise decision.
3 Likes
No, no, that’s far too reasonable. It has to be something like the same 10 forums frequenters who spam post about LFD actually represent the majority of the player base. Or that everyone against LFD are actually RMTers who fear their monopoly’s collapse.
1 Like
“We polled 10 people, and decided the majority of citizens don’t want this” thats how governments work, yaknow
1 Like
This is basically it tbh
I’m willing to bet they’re analytics on the whole situation show that not putting rdf in the game is more profitable.
Hence why no RDF.
What are you talking about? They’re removing Arena teams in WoTLK Classic. Spell batching existed in original Wrath; are you going to be campaigning for these things to be included in WoTLK Classic? Do you want a:
or not?
1 Like
At this point I’ll take what I can get. It’s clear they created Wrath Reforged to milk the nostalgia out of players so one battle must be won at a time.
RDF is required for Wrath to succeed, there is no opposition to it at all aside from trolls and contrarians as most of the evidence points to it being wanted by a majority of the player base.
If they can’t even get that right then I have no hope they’ll do anything by the original game.
3 Likes
Sadly, it’s been proven that they do not. They will continue to make blunder after blunder and it will not move the ticker tape very much, if at all.
1 Like
Oh there’s that tired nochanges argument, fitting you’d use a level 10 to post that.
If you actually knew anything about the history of the game, you’d know RDF had more of an effect on cataclysm moving forward then it did wrath, specifically because, as you mentioned, it was released on the final content patch of wrath. So suggesting it was a big part of wrath as a whole, or that it should be released on the first phase instead of the final, are both pretty goofy. And seeing as Bliz are already asking people about how they feel about cataclysm and its features, and how they should release them, it’s safe to say you should leave your NoChanges argument back in vanilla classic where it belongs.
1 Like
It was part of wrath for slightly under half the lifetime of the expansion, 47 or 48% of the game, just under half. So I’d say that quantifies as being a “big part” of the expansion. what is and isn’t considered a “big part” of wrath is usually left to the players personal feelings as well.
It can’t be both a flashpoint for a slippery slope argument that puts the weight of retails mistakes on the shoulders of RDF and “not a big part” of the expansion it came from at the same time.
oh, first phase or when ICC is unlocked I don’t really care when/if it is released in classic, I just like the tool. I don’t think it’s something players should need right at launch time, but that’s my view.
1 Like
What’s goofier is balancing around Patch 3.3 with none of the Patch 3.3 features, your logic is just as inconsistent as the Dev’s logic.
1 Like
Except you simply took what I said and inverted it, which doesn’t work because many people support my position, and basically no one supports yours; the majority of people who are NOT pro RDF are neutral about the matter. I sincerely doubt anyone has said they won’t play if RDF is put in. You’re a poor troll, maybe get a little better at it.
“People don’t want to be mugged in the streets”
AHA I KNOW I’ll just say “People enjoy, and want to be, mugged in the streets!”
my argument using the same tactic is completely solid!
1 Like
People who don’t want LFG don’t need a space to circlejërk eachother into believing they’re correct.
3 Likes
The funny thing is people think them removing that had anything to do with making the game better. Almost 100% they just didn’t want to bother with trying to make it work.
1 Like
They don’t have a space anywhere at all by the looks of it, ya’ll are circlejërking on our threads instead because no one will let you have such a troll and contrarian opinion since it benefits nobody.