Weapons transmog

While you are unlocking single minded fury transmog for warrior can we talk about subtelty and assassination???

13 Likes

And Outlaw with crossbows.

:surfing_man: :surfing_woman:

2 Likes

I would prefer if they add bows for outlaw but really there should be a choice.

3 Likes

I accidentally created another thread about this because I didn’t see yours, but I’ll add my comment here to bump it because I 100% agree.

Pretty sure Assassination and Subtlety have been stuck with just daggers since Lich King, or possibly even Burning Crusade, with no variety. We should be able to use our Swords and Fist Weapons.

And Outlaw with crossbows.

Honestly, I’d be fine with literally anything other than a gun. I get it fits the Swashbuckler fantasy, but I’d even settle for Pocket Sand or a quickly thrown dagger. Just SOMETHING.

3 Likes

indeed!

ive been saying for a while now that classes should be able to use all weapon choices! they need to stop restricting that. its basic and boring.

same. there should’ve been glyphs added by now allowing options of daggers, bows or crossbows. even axes.

I agree with expanding the transmog system to allow say all one handers archetypes to be transmogable.

Though I don’t think it makes sense to completely remove all restrictions. For example one handers to 2 handers doesnt make sense.

I am ok with the warrior change as warriors are intrinsically the one class that have always had 0 weapon restrictions (which fits their class theme) also fury historically was dual wielding 1 handers. The removal of SMF (good change) with their transmog restriction being removed (2hander → 1hander) makes sense.

Though for rogue for me it wouldn’t make sense to allow transmogging 1 hander → 2 hander or even to bows.

To re-iterate though all 1 hander archetypes should be transmogabble including fist weapons for Rogue and any class that can naturally wield 1 hander.

Another personal nitpick would be to continue to respect legendary class restrictions for transmogs, speaking of …why are glaives DH only when they existed before DH did …. :thinking: … (justice for rogues and warriors!) though wouldn’t overly care if they got rid of the restrictions. I think they already have, pretty sure I have seen casters running around with Thunderfury (if im not mistaken)

3 Likes

well why would there even be an option in the first place to mog ranged weapons, when rogues literally cant use them anymore lmao and ill also say for any outlaw that wants to go “but i wanna mog my gun!” what gun… :no_mouth: you dont use an actual gun to mog, you got glyphs for the fake gun we use from the side pocket dimension we carry around but no real ranged weapon.. mogs should stay as is. dagger babies just need to idk stop playing dagger specs if you wanna mog something not a dagger. idk man, sin rogue using muti with maces doesnt make any logical sense. same with sub rogue, backstab implies pointy object stabbing. using a mace/axe/sword makes no logical sense, can you stab with a sword or point of an axe sure. but a dagger is far more effective. :man_shrugging:

also glaives are restricted to DH because of retcon, i mean legion. like this is a long history now, and a point to late lmao. rogues been asking for glaives to be moggable since mog was introduced. its just not happening because DH exists now even though for the longest time the glaives were labled as SWORDS lmao. and yes anyone can wield TF because its just a sword now, and most classes can use 1h sword and its restrictions were broken down literally the next expansion and into wotlk and by cata it was everyones weapon. “you get a TF, you get a TF and you! also get a TF” legendaries are kind of… old concepts now anyway right? like i dont see the excitement of a leggo when its just pushed into the nothingness void by the next expansion. thats why it was exciting seeing one in the age of vanilla/tbc OG. when they started passing out leggos like candy in legion and then again in shadowlands… lmao ooof.

1 Like

I think its because the skills animation of daggers are diferent from 1h/fists weapons, thats why sub/mut are stuck with them. Would love to use fist as sub or mut tho

Also, about daggers being more effective at stabbing i disagree, a spear or rapier is way more effective than a dagger at stabbing people. Also blunt weapons works fine too, hence why u sap with a bonk animation, so imo i would see no problem with backstab being allowed for 1h/fists weapon. Katar is a fist weapon and its also pretty good at stabbing.

There’s also even a dagger with a looking of a butcher weapon. https://www.wowhead.com/item=53246/neurosurgeons-tool

So eh, idk, i think its more of a dagger skills animations than allowing them to be mogged into 1h/fists.

Wouldnt mind a glyph to change the pistol animation to a blunderbuss one instead or a 1 handed crossbow like survival hunters use