It is stil, most likely, the best lego for venthyr warriors.
Im going to make battlelord out of curiosity though
It is stil, most likely, the best lego for venthyr warriors.
Im going to make battlelord out of curiosity though
you have a perma 20% damage wall with no real cd and a rage dump that absorbs 8k hp thats borderline spammable.
yea but d stance reduces our damage
10% of unhealable damage is still a lot of damage.
so warrior is unhealable damage ? hmm interesting
Bahahahha shame on u ya ape. Cheese to win never lasts long. Unless you are a boomie.
are you saying condemn warrior isnt one of the highest damaging melee dps in the game? you realize you can sweep and kill two targets faster than they can run from you right?
need a dmg buff. avatar needs to be 30% instead of 20%
Iâve never seen a warrior do more than 50% of their damage from condemn unless theyâre killing someone with 23k hp. Youâre being disingenuous. Even before switching to Venthyr, it wasnât uncommon to get a Sudden death proc and use that to take them down to 35% hp and immediately execute two more times for the kill.
Iâve never seen a warrior do more than 50% of their damage from condemn unless theyâre killing someone with 23k hp. Youâre being disingenuous. Even before switching to Venthyr, it wasnât uncommon to get a Sudden death proc and use that to take them down to 35% hp and immediately execute two more times for the kill
Iâve seen it over 50% plenty of times lol.
Iâm not being disingenuous at all, youâre just biased because you play it.
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-gb/character/us/bonechewer/friedboy
The only time youâre not condemning is when youâre out of rage so you overpower or keeping deep wounds up.
You literally said â80-90%â of my damage is condemn. I contended that Iâve never seen a warrior do more than 50% of their damage from condemn in an actual game vs people that canât be two shotted, which is simply a fact that can be verified by maybe playing one battleground and checking the details meter. If you werenât being disingenuous, then youâre just stupid. Itâs not my personal bias that I can read and you canât.
Our rotations are literally identical except I open with warbreaker condemn and then start your normal rotation until they get topped off or hit 35%. Your big brain kyrian rotation really isnât that different.
contended that Iâve never seen a warrior do more than 50% of their damage from condemn in an actual game vs people that canât be two shotted, which is simply a fact that can be verified by maybe playing one battleground and checking the details meter. If you werenât being disingenuous, then youâre just stupid. Itâs not my personal bias that I can read and you canât.
The warrior I q rbgs with is Venthyr and on average condemn is at least 60% of his damage.
Ive never seen a warrior do less than 60% of damage with condemn.
Iâve seen it happen in games where he has to just run and only use rage on ignore pain. So like, almost never
Condemn is 50% of dmg done only against aff locks because thats the only way they can connect for almost 2 seconds
Venthyr warriors wear socks in bed
Is this him complaining about PVE or we actually asking for more PvP buffs on wars?
with this change making it to live arms warriors will never be viable
this was their one chance, how could blizzard do this?