This is all anecdotal. I’ve never claimed they were or weren’t, just that quoting flawed polls is no way to determine either way.
Anecdotal, Hearsay.
LMAO This is rich coming from you. HAHAHAHAH,
Where have I claimed anything is fact? I’ve disputed you claiming flawed data as fact, that is all.
We have evidence that LFD was preferred and more enjoyed. We don’t have any proof that LFD isn’t popular.
Blizzard can use all the fluffy words they want, but there is no community worth preserving by hurting the game overall.
That’s not hearsay. That’s noting a trend historically.
I think you need to google what Anecdotal means. You’re entire argument is just that. Holy moly you must be trolling at this point right?
Where? You’re not going to go in circles with these “Polls” that are clearly flawed?
You sound just like the person they should listen too.
Show me the trend that supports your claim.
You’re arguments are pointless. Spewing the same crap over and over doesn’t make you right.
Says the anecdotal, speculative naysayer literally without any empirical data. 
1 Like
So I’ve agreed with you on the compromise, but you claiming that every poll so far has been flawed, that’s just ignorant.
These forums, those polls, YouTube, in-game, private servers, etc.
No-LFD Wrath was tested and the backlash was so severe they added it back. The difference may be the arrogance of Blizzard, however, and they may stubbornly leave it out for a time.
Yes, thanks for noticing.
You want me to go find posts from 16 years ago crying about blood elves, or find a handful of posts that were against LFD 14 years ago?
They are flawed. Few people that have got what they want go looking to participate in polls advocating for change.
No-LFD isn’t a compromise in the same way no-flight wasn’t. Pathfinder was an ugly compromise to a problem manufactured by Blizzard.
We don’t want compromise. We want it in game, just as virtually every anti-LFD poster doesn’t want it in game.
2 Likes
It would be flawed if they didn’t show a percentage of players against RDF.
I would still like a follow-up on why you said I was one of the leading causes for crap talking.
Every single one eh? Every publicly open poll is compromised? You can’t cite one single article or poll with evidence that supports your claim? 
It’s almost as if you are circle-jerking the same repetitive speculative garbage.
“People don’t want RDF, all the data is biased and compromised!”
– trust me bro.
The only truly not flawed poll would require it to be put in game and on the website and be advertised, and to have a small reward for answering it.
Since Blizzard isn’t going to do that the best we have are the various polls that all say the same thing.
you originally replied with a video with zero context, making it seem you on the anti RDF side. Thanks for editing and verifying 
Anecdotal and flawed, when there is an official poll, then you can claim this “Majority” that is your justification for RDF being implemented. Until then quoting all these useless flawed data points is just absurd.
This will just keep going in circles and circles, blizzard won’t change what they’ve decided without some consensus in the community.
They should do an official poll, it would be the smart move. They should also try to accommodate both camps so both camps can be reasonably happy with the result.
Hence why I made a post asking for opinions about a compromise.
But this back and forth spewing useless words that mean nothing is just drowning out the ability to get real change.
Again with your silly “Polls” you’re just choosing to be ignorant to the facts that these polls are full of confirmation bias by the disgruntled losers.
Still waiting on you to provide the “facts” that supports anti RDF ideal.