Woo… You got me confused here with someone else friend. I been trying to convince the nah sayers that players do want RDF and have showed data before. They just always yell fake news or that polls are wrong…
What are you even talking about?
Classic grouping meta is analog…retail is digital.
Gen X, ya know the ones caught in the crossfire of boomers vs millenials, Yall aren’t laughing at all. Your crying and yelling at anyone who will listen, for the most part its combative and argumentative with no intention of consideration for an opposing viewpoint. Its Tribalistic and shows how mob mentality stifles creative dialogue and reinforces an us vs them dogma.
2 Likes
The game you play isn’t Classic Wow.
You’re right. I don’t. Not when you’re unwillingly to substantiate your viewpoint.
Utter garbage. Just more word vomit trying to impose a false sense hood and grand standing on a viewpoint that can’t even be bothered by to be verified by facts.
If you were a lawyer making arguments like this you’d lose every single case you took. Absolute. Cringe. 
No, you’re right, it’s TBC Classic.
I’m fine with LFD.
How to tell me you didn’t read the thread without telling me you didn’t read the thread.
Which is a retail progression server and not Classic.
Clearly a child.
1 Like
Or a ken doll
1 Like
Oh look now we’ve resorted to name calling. Classy. Defending an untenable argument and calling me a child. This is literally the equivalent of “NO U!”
Yeah, I was the 1 that resorted to name calling 
2 Likes
I like how none of the quoted text is actually name calling.
First is clarification to a post, Second/Third are assumptions on the demographics because they seem the most opposed and the last one is a statement of opinion. Try again.
I also like the many many posts you make calling people misogynist.
You’re all over the place yapping like a rabid dog.
They were 100% misogynist for supporting man-splaining and inferring women are an inferior sex. If you disagree with that… holy cow yikes…
Again, more of a collective term describing these boomers or keyboard warriors trying to spew nonsense on these forums acting like there opinion is open and validated.
But hey, it’s tit for tat right? Since you know, you have no ammunition left for point of view, let’s just boil it down to playground mentality. It’s clear you have zero faith left making a good argument.
These people are insane though. They just want to argue schematics when clearly all data suggests that the majority of the community would benefit from the change.
Whataboutisms, speculation, assumptions, they’ve actually convinced themselves these are valid points of arguments and when they start acknowledging they resort to name calling or schoolyard bullying. It’s quite a spectacle really.
1 Like
I’ve already made my argument here and other places, constantly quoting confirmation bias polls isn’t a good argument. Both sides have a point, spewing useless misinformation isn’t going to help you get your own way.
Flawed data. I could go to a Ford supporters convention and ask what is the best car brand, when it comes back with an overwhelming support for Ford it doesn’t mean Ford is the best car brand or that the majority of the population think Ford is the best car brand, it means my data is flawed.