Will be any [armored to the teeth] compensation?
Or warriors is going to be D tier like its nothing?
1 Like
We don’t know if this talent is affected by the armor changes yet or not. Are you suggesting that warriors aren’t going to be doing enough damage without that talent?
Lmao no point in playing warrior rn, we just keep getting kicked while we’re already down. 
1 Like
Yes, warriors are already behind most melees in current state, so you are basically nerfing my armor and my damage… which means it will probably be worst melee 2k+, mid tier melee 2k-
Drustvar has Arms 5th in overall representation and only behind DH and UDK in representation for DPS specs above 2400. I’m not saying that armored to the teeth shouldn’t be adjusted or not but this notion that warriors are weak is a bit absurd.
As someone who doesn’t rated PVP as war, I’m OK with this nerf
if i say ur handsome will u change ur mind
Warriors are at 11Âş place overall representation 2200+
Yet they are 5th above 2400. Seems that the higher you go the better they get then.
rep is bad argument for viability stop arguing with it
2400+ warriors are at 9Âş place
Rep is objectively more solid argument than opinions
Are this argument perfect? no
Are this argument better than your opinion? yes
This is what I don’t get about people applauding this sort of thing. Arms is strong in PVP sure, but that’s pretty much the only endgame content where warrior is strong rn, and they are not overly strong when you look at tier lists. PVE endgame as warrior is a complete joke, try getting into high keys or raids. This is gonna be around a 4%-6% loss in dps including the fact we’ll be less tanky overall, which means you’ll see less and less warriors at high ratings. 4%-6% is the difference between someone living or dying when in execute range. Pretty soon there won’t be anything to do in the game for warrior mains at the highest level of endgame ^^:
2 Likes
Arms is a popular spec for pvp and will always have a high representation even when its bad.
Aug was incredibly overtuned last season but still had one of the lowest representation. 
3 Likes
rep is just an incomplete piece of the puzzle, and some classes are just always going to be played because some classes are just played by alot of people lmao. arms warrior will always have high rep, some specs even when good have lower rep than bad specs.
To be fair, representation is a metric. The data has to be relevant and conclusions from hypothesis need to make sense.
Yes, yet it is more complete than “the class is good, but nobody is playing” opinion
so does a class need to have high rep to be considered good? just curious.
no
but the problem is not considering class X or Y “good”
I can consider enhancement and feral as “good” specs…
It doesn’t mean anything if there are 6,7,8 EXCELLENT specs above them
is arms warrior better than outlaw rogue
What is better?
a) a company that employs 15 employees where each one receives $15,000 dollars
b) a company that employs 3 employees who earn $20,000 each