Hey, toxic implosions and infighting is a Horde tradition.
When you’re saddled with testosterone drunk jingoists, omnicidal nihilists, and William Henry Harrisons, it’s gonna happen.
1 Like
"The original article, formerly located at http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/encyclopedia/index.xml, did not survive the overhaul of the World of Warcraft Official Website. "
Do quotes make the text invisible now? It was literally overhauled and that “lore” removed.
IS ME’DAN CANON? YES OR NO?
Show me that official source on the changed canon.
1 Like
“Path of Glory” honestly still one of the darkest lore moments but at the same time really showed how evil they were.
Ya’ll do glow like light bulbs
"The original article, formerly located at http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/encyclopedia/index.xml, did not survive the overhaul of the World of Warcraft Official Website. "
If it doesn’t exist, it’s no longer canon.
You can’t go “YOU HAVE TO PROVE TO ME THIS DELETED SOURCE THAT IS NO LONGER OFFICIAL ISN’T CANON”
Prove to me my character isn’t the king of Azeroth.
Show me the Lore that changed my character from King of Azeroth.
Show me the lore that says Me’dan is no longer canon.
A remodeled website broken link is not what I asked for. I asked for something stated by Blizzard that the lore has changed.
2 Likes
So you believe Me’dan is canon?
Canon source for your fanon?
1 Like
Stop dodging the question.
You know you’re wrong because you’re unable to accept that Me’dan is canon, which by your logic he is.
But you can’t STAND being wrong so you avoid facing reality.
Just accept it.
Your lore is deleted. It doesn’t need to have a statement from Blizzard saying “yes we specifically changed this lore” when they literally deleted it and CHANGED THE SITE HOSTING IT.
Hilarious.
How much more official is “we deleted this” going to get?
Stop acting willfully ignorant.
That’s not how lore works. Lore and canon is “Stated story is accurate and corrected unless contradicted in the future”
Dadgar has it. As to how he got it. 
Blizzard hasn’t told us.
There is no such thing as “all but officially” it’s either out or in.
Then you base the story based on what exists. If it is contradicted the newest story is canon and the old story is not.
Lor’themar is silly. He’s not a politician he’s a soldier.
And it remains canon until a dev or in game source contradicts it.
Has blizzard said he is no longer canon? Until then he exists. That’s just how facts work. You don’t have to like facts for them to be correct. Now I don’t really feel like blizzard will ever use him so for all intents and purposes he would be akin to non canon but until there is an official source that dismisses his existence or contradicts it he exists. Crappy lore is still lore.
The second thing you said has been stated in game and by devs so that change is canon. There are high elves on the alliance also true but they do not outnumber blood elves.
You can use the wayback machine if you don’t believe it used to exist.
The burden of proof is on you. Things in rest stay in rest. In this case things aren’t changed unless they’re stated to be changed. You must prove that it is no longer canon and not being referenced on the website anymore is not a source. A lot of things got removed in the revamp.
The lore was not deleted the article that went into details about it was.
Just cause you don’t like something doesn’t make it illogical.
In cata countless quests were removed. That doesn’t mean they were no longer canon.
2 Likes
Because a deleted site is not a new source on lore. It’s just we changed our site and deleted a page.
Stop deflecting troll.
3 Likes
“See I don’t have an argument and I’ve lost, so I’m just going to call what you said funny because I have nothing left to say that adds to the discussion.”
Thanks for reminding me that I shouldn’t argue with people who think deleted lore like Me’dan and High Elf population numbers are still valid.
It was removed for a reason. Get over it.
Or it’s truly funny if you believe your own line of bs.
You’re the one telling me Me’dan is canon.
Deleting a page of lore means said lore is no longer factual, that’s just basic common sense.
Every accusation is a confession.
Never mentioned him.
Keep dreaming.
If you think Warcraft encyclopedia is canon because “no one has point blank said it’s not canon” despite the fact it was deleted.
That means you think Me’dan is canon.
You don’t get to change your philosophy on what is and isn’t canon when it suits you.
But Horde players have never known anything else but that so lmao.
I think what Blizz says is canon. And if you are unsure about that, go ask the writers about it. They post on Twitter.
1 Like
Why don’t you go ask them if the Lore pages they delete are still canon?
I’m sure the answer you get will surprise you 