Visage Form Representation

Hello,

I just wanted to express my thoughts about how we should be able to choose what form we want to have showcased on the WoW website and forum picture. I’m sure there’s many of us that would like to show our Visage form rather than our dracthyr form to the world as our chosen identity.

Also I think Flameshaper Hero Tree was better named Ruby Adept.

Thank you!

3 Likes

I liked ruby adept better.
Agree on the rest, this class needs some work done.

1 Like

What work?

Visage and transmog, many suggestions have been brought forward these past months.

2 Likes

So you mean the race needs some work?

They are one and the same, don’t be daft.
If you want to argue there is the thread on evoker’s range.

2 Likes

But they won’t be eventually, so it’s not daft you cheeky little bugger innit.

Saying the class needs work implies design/kit and I was curious what you were proposing.

Oh awesome, I’ll go find one of the range threads while you cry more about holy paladin needing buffs on the pally forums (it’s really good on ptr btw).

Let’s meet back here on Chewsday to debrief.

Where is it that I’m crying about holy pala? :confused: