Update MM can keep their pet

[Ravenbella-turalyon (Ravenbella)]

If I wanted to be meta, I wouldn’t play a hunter period.

[Tondrill-area-52]

Can someone direct me to the blue post about MM keeping the pet by chosing a talent option please… id like to report it to all the damn %#@%^ who kept saying play bm or the majority of MM don’t use pets … looks like there are a lot of MM who like to have the choice of using their pet and having him /her /it around for fun and solo adventures … Soo happy because 2 decades of playing with a pet would have sucked not to have my pal around.

[Feyori-dreamscythe]

Let’s see if I can post this link:

Feedback: Hunters

Greetings, hunters. We appreciate your continued feedback on the Undermine(d) Marksmanship update. We recognize that there is a community of Marksmanship Hunters who wish to retain access to their pets. While Marksmanship’s unique Eagle pet will continue to be the source of their pet utility, such as Master’s Call, Bloodlust, and similar effects, we think it is only right that Marksmanship Hunters be able to continue to traverse Azeroth with their beloved companions. In our next PTR build, the…

[Veidmann-zuljin]

@Toverian-alexstrasza

Now that they get a choice back it hurts you though?

It’s not the getting back of pets that hurts them it is actually the fact that they found joy in others misery in not being able to use pets that made them happy. Now Blizz has taken away their sourcre of happiness by giving those they enjoyed being miserable back what they wanted.

Some people just can’t be happy unless others aren’t.

[Veidmann-zuljin]

@Lfabowjob-illidan

Great so they fixed the lust issue for MM hunters who don’t want to run a pet and for those who do want the option of having a pet, but are completely ignoring the problems that having to run a lust pet has for BM.

I agree it should be a class wide spell and that all pet utilities should be moved over to the hunter . I think a change like that would get BM and Surv hunters to pick a pet that most fits their race instead of a pet that fits the content they are doing .

@Onlyslams-uldum

Bad change. I hope MM winds up bottom of the barrel now and insta declined for all content in patch 11.1. I was going to try it but now I’m embarrassed to even play my hunter

You do know this was meant mainly for MM hunters that want a pet for open world content right?

The changes are still staying and will be the optimal choice for group content and to be honest a lot of people are going to have multiple load outs like pet load out for open world , raid loadout if they raid and a m+ load out for highend dungeons and there will probably be those with pvp load outs.

So since the returning pets don’t actually affect the changes I’m guessing you were never going to play hunter anyways or you if you do , your not wanting to play because you are no longer getting to see others miserable about not being able to use pets as MM.

@Onlyslams-uldum

, why play MM if you want pet to do all the work?

With BM/Pet most of the damge is done by the pet . With MM/Pet it is mostly done by the MM. The pet is to keep the target at range .

[Istolilly-eonar]

I could have predicted this happening. For as long as how good BM spec had it since Legion, they have some ’s to try to ruin MM. BM needed to be its own class, because I knew this was going to happen.

SV mains suffered for years and now they’re doing it to MM.

MM+SV need their own community and class devs that wouldn’t be bothered by the pet-based combat demands of Beastmaster.

It’s not the first time: we correctly told Blizzard for years MSV was a mistake and they were too proud to roll it back. We are going to continue getting screwed as long as we’re still stuck with BM mains in the same house.

[Syegfryed-tol-barad (Syegfryed)]

@Veidmann-zuljin

I agree it should be a class wide spell and that all pet utilities should be moved over to the hunter

This is somehow kind fixed, since now all pets can be ferocity again.

But it would be nice to have on the hunter, so you could pick between cunning/tenacity

[Cymbelladine-sisters-of-elune]

@Veidmann-zuljin

I agree it should be a class wide spell and that all pet utilities should be moved over to the hunter . I think a change like that would get BM and Surv hunters to pick a pet that most fits their race instead of a pet that fits the content they are doing .

Last I heard they’re giving you the ability to pick your pet’s spec., so any pet will be able to be a Primal Rage pet.

[Lfabowjob-illidan]

That doesn’t solve the problem. Then as BM you still lose a DEF CD for the ability to lust. No other lust class has to lose something to be able to lust.

[Cymbelladine-sisters-of-elune]

Different classes are different.