Yeah people dont want to play those roles. If I or any other ret paladin wanted to tank or heal we would do that. We dont want to. Get it through your head. We like playing melee DPS paladins.
Anyways, they could have made glyph of exo reduce the CD by like 8 seconds or something, that would have been a more impactful change.
3 Likes
Ok. feel free to reroll then.
1 Like
This change just shows moaning and whining like a bunch of ungrateful children will get you what you want, and yet people still happy
Buffs arent needed, if theyre making changes buff all of the lowest common denominator specs not just ret
Another stupid change
2 Likes
Thats not Blizzards problem, that is a you problem.
1 Like
What specs? Frost? That’s a PVP spec.
Ret is the lowest PVE spec. It’s being buffed.
I’m going to keep telling Blizzard they’re idiots, thanks for trying to dictate how I spend my monthly sub though. I’m more inclined to just stop paying for the sub because they do garbage like this instead of actual fixes to a spec that needs attention.
Rets that pvp shouldnt get the buff then only makes sense
This comment is beyond stupid
1 Like
not a fan of the recent string of class balancing changes. feels like since the DK nerf the classic team is sliding down a slippery hill. leave WOTLK alone!
6 Likes
What buff is ret pvp getting? Just the application of seal from DS/CS? Not a big deal.
Ok. you do that. because it’s clear you dont actually play anyways. Most rets currently run glyph of avenging wrath over glyph of consecrate anyways, which not only makes us cast consecrate more often, it also makes us cast hammer of wrath more often, yet we still don’t oom. You clearly don’t know what youre talking about so anything you whine about can be safely disregarded
1 Like
I’ll reiterate I appreciate them trying but it’s not enough and I’m loving my resto shaman way more right now.
It’s just too little and too late currently.
Oh look another hot take.
bad ret dps =/= bad frost mage or sub rogue dps.
They all have DPS SPECS in the middle of the pack or better. Your opinion is pointlessly argumentative. Would it personally hurt you to bring it to the middle of the pack? I cant understand where your coming from. But please keep telling us that ret being bad is the same as pure dps classes 3rd spec not being good DPS.
2 Likes
I guess I will just wait for the Sarthe video to let me know if it’s good.
Yaaaa brothers, ret’s are now tied for worst
7 Likes
I am a bit amused given that last time they discussed rets they said “No, we’re not buffing Rets because they the class as a whole is fine”
The balancing act can be hard I guess, but on the surface as a consumer of their statements they are all over the place.
1 Like
That’s nice but this buff was aimed at ret paladins. You’re not a ret paladin. I’m not sure why your input about loving your resto shaman is needed in a ret paladin thread.
First, thank you for the post.
Do know that the buff is appreciated. Allowing Crusader Strike and Divine Storm to apply stacks of Holy Vengeance is especially good news. Waiting for it to slowly apply via autoswing was awful, especially when a swings was dodged or parried.
Regarding the Hand of Reckoning Glyph, it isn’t the buff I would’ve given. I do still think that tuning the Vengeance, Righteous Vengeance, and/or Two-Handed Weapon Specialization talents would’ve been a more elegant way to buff the spec. However, the attention to Ret’s under-performance is still very appreciated.
5 Likes
Glyph should be Minor, not Major.
5 Likes
Then Brian got fired. See the difference?
Except they arent https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1017#dataset=90
Theyre above warriors but what ever agenda floats your boat
1 Like