Unarmored Mounts Megathread 2.0

WoW Classic WoW Classic General Discussion
837

Hopefully the cover it in a QandA, seems like they havn’t taken any community feed back. Just bug reports.

1 Like
838

LOL

Well. That’s not going to work.

“We done took these here mounts out the game, that’ll show them thar speed levelers!”

Because the reason why people rush to 60 is for mounts.

3 Likes
839

“That’s how I like to play”

1 Like
840

I’m still banking on my theory that at least a few at Blizz or Activision are hoping to push out a Classic Cash Shop with all the absent stuff they decide to leave out the game for…“reasons”.

They are excluding them to prevent rush mentality. So, does that mean after the Naxx patch, they’ll add them to the game? Yeah, we know better.

2 Likes
841

1 Like
842

/gigglesnort, IKR?

:ram: :tiger2: :racehorse:

2 Likes
843

Nice cherry pick.

The person that made that statement used the term “WE” throughout almost the entire statement.

"It is the current vendor mounts for 1.12. We aren’t putting back the unarmored mounts. We just talked about this recently internally. We know some people are interested in them, but we don’t want to put them in for a limited period of time, because we didn’t want to influence people through their first leveling experience. Especially people coming back for the first time. We don’t want people to feel like they have to rush. If you want to level slowly and enjoy the journey, you should. That’s how I like to play–taking it slow, running every dungeon.”

Yes, that person did state his personal preference to take his time at the end of that statement.

When speaking about those mounts and the decision, it was “WE” indicating that he was speaking for Blizzard at those times. You apparently chose to pretend those didn’t exist, though.

We all know that you will continue to complain forever, though, unless Blizzard caves and gives you that shiny you so desparately crave.

1 Like
844

Sure, but the indisputable fact is they removed them. If they intended people to still get them, they… wouldn’t have removed their source.

845

Rushers have enough reasons. They don’t need yet another. And mount collectors certainly don’t need a reason to rush to level cap if they’re the type of player who’d normally be taking their time.

846

So let’s just go without because some people can’t restrain themselves… :roll_eyes:

1 Like
847

Nice cherry pick. Read the rest of my post, please, because that is far more important than my disdain for speed levelers.

848

The code still exists, source has not been removed.

849

That was your main selling point in that post. If that’s not what you meant why mention?

850

I was referring to the source as in where/how you get the item lol :roll_eyes:

851

Because you were the one who brought up speed levelers. I wanted to address as many points as possible.

And no, it was NOT my “main selling point.”

852

You continue to speculate.
The company has not come out and said “we don’t want these mounts in Classic because they were placeholders and we wanted them removed”.
What you are doing is spreading misinformation based on what you “feel” happened.

2 Likes
853

I’m not talking about the placeholder aspect. I am talking about the fact they did not want players to obtain them past that point. It is indisputable. They removed them. If they did not want that, they would not have done so.

854

Ok Laeric, you made two points in your short paragraph. Tell me, was your main point about rushing or mount collecting? From what I’m reading here, the main selling point is rushing.

855

I feel attacked now.

856

Sorry you feel that way, I was quite polite. It’s still early, maybe your day will improve. :smiley_cat: