Why are you still here, you already stated that you don’t care either way… you don’t have a dog in this fight.
Please, discontinue whatever off topic argument you two are having and keep the thread on topic.
1 Like
Have you not finished writing your letter to Blizzard HQ or started planning your trip there? This crusade on the forums has not done anything for you. Try a new method.
1 Like
My apologies then, it’s a common occurrence on these forum.
Adding, the 39 bracket is my favorite.
Their actions stated it. If they didn’t want them out, they wouldn’t have removed them and then doubled down by not putting them in classic.
1 Like
Calling others immature whilst simultaneously demeaning others for using the forums for their intended purpose. Maybe I will write a letter to blizzard, who knows!
1 Like
That makes absolutely no sense, their reasoning for removing them has never been stated… their reasoning for not including them in classic has absolutely nothing to do with why they were removed originally.
2 Likes
No, they merely stated this actions were to prevent the rush mentality.
You are speculating. Your imagination is flawed.
4 Likes
They removed them once and doubled down on not letting anyone get them in the new iteration, but you want to believe that somehow doesn’t mean they don’t want people to have them. Okayyyy. I get that you don’t agree with their decision but their objective result is pretty clear.
1 Like
I feel bad for anyone reading this who is being misinformed by your posts.
You are putting words in blizzards mouth and making lots of assumptions. Where did blizzard say “we don’t want you to have these mounts”???
Links please or continue to spew uninformed lies.
1 Like
Sorry but I feel really strongly on this position, even more so because I don’t see or understand their reasoning on it. I’m glad you are here though, why do you believe these mounts shouldn’t be in classic?
3 Likes
They have already stated that they don’t care either way… they are just here to demean and bully us for requesting something whilst simultaneously calling us immature
It is not misinformation to cite past actions as evidence of something. They made them no longer attainable, and based on the artificial rarity that came of that decision, they doubled down on it by not adding them to classic. The fact that you don’t want to see it that way does not make it untrue.
1 Like
False, their reasoning for keeping them out of classic has absolutely nothing to do with the artificial rarity of the mounts.
And yes, you are spreading misinformation when you cite the past actions of others with your own implied reasoning. You are not the voice of blizzard, your opinion is no more important than anyone else’s.
Blizzard has never stated why they were removed originally, and furthermore their reason for not including them in classic has nothing to do with that. Your attempt to connect the two and push your own agenda wouldn’t get past the scrutiny of a high school level English paper rubric.
1 Like
We don’t want to believe they don’t want us to have them, as Shimy said, their vague response showed little interest on the topic, or worse dismissal. Their quick reason is flawed to the bone, the overall arguement on this thread has come down to no mounts vs any implementation would be fine for 99% of players.
1 Like
That’s not what I said lol. Their reason for taking them out of classic was they didn’t want players to get them anymore. The artificial rarity came out of that and they reinforced the decision made in classic.
Their actions are their voice.
If they didn’t want players to be able to acquire them anymore why did they allow them to be sold until WotLk/Cata?
They can’t win if they give you guys an in depth reason. You guys will try to pick it apart like it’s a math equation and they said 2 + 2 = 5. That’s not how they make these decisions. They have design philosophies and feeling in their decisions. You guys will not be happy with anything other than “oh ok you guys are right we change our minds”. So is it any wonder they give a quick response and move on.
1 Like
Because they were already earned by that point by the buyer in that boe state. They do not routinely take already earned things away from players. They remove the source. This is wholly in line with how they act on tons of other items with removed sources in the game. And now they have the option to prevent people from ever obtaining them, and so chose to do so.
1 Like
Which I completely disagree with and will continue to disagree with. People keep asking us why we care about the mounts so much… that question goes both ways…why do they care so much that the mounts aren’t added… why do you care so much?
And furthermore… blizzard literally asked us to post our feedback, thoughts, requests, and grievances in this forum, so I fail to see why you are so adamant about getting us to stop asking. It’s almost like you have some alternative motive other than improving the game… could it be that you already own one of these mounts in retail and are attempting to further solidify their rarity?
3 Likes
That’s fine that you disagree, and I am not trying to stop you from voicing your opinion, I just oppose it. I care for the same base reasons you do, I just happen to interpret what is best for the game differently than you do.
1 Like