Unarmored Mounts Megathread 2.0

Bump. Blizzard needs to make it just like it was as much as possible, that includes the original mounts!

4 Likes

Bump! Love these mounts, and the white stallion is my personal favorite. Having these mounts available in classic would be a huge plus for me. Looking forward to classic as it gets closer with each passing day!

6 Likes

Did you get suspended again? August is next month and Blizzard still haven’t said a single word on this. Great…

2 Likes

bump blizzard can not silence us.

4 Likes

No I have been super busy this past week!

1 Like

I am actually going to be more sad by the fact that I won’t be playing with you wonderful people. I feel like we’ve become so close just by having the same interests! :pensive::cry::disappointed:

3 Likes

Maybe we can get an unarmored mount layer!

4 Likes

Let us all know how that works out for you.

1 Like

Assuming Blizzard actually listened to players and agreed to add French and German language realms, let’s hope they’ll listen to the plea for unarmored mounts too.

6 Likes

I meant that I won’t be playing at all on the America’s region.

1 Like

-Scenario 1 - Unarmored mounts are implemented for phase 1

Player A - Levels to 60 at his own pace, casually gets there in 3 weeks. This leaves
the casual player 3 weeks to earn rep and 1000g.

Player B - Levels to 60 asap, no lifes and gets there in 1 week. This leaves the
hardcore player 5 weeks to earn rep and 1000g.

Player C - Levels to 60 at his own pace, only logs on with his extremely casual
friend, and gets there in 6 weeks. This leaves no time for him to obtain the
mount.

-Scenario 2 - No unarmored mounts

Player A - Still levels casually to 60, gets there in 3 weeks. No chance at
unarmored mounts.

Player B - Still levels to 60 asap, cause he’s hardcore like that. No chance at
unarmored mounts.

Player C - Still levels to 60 extremely casually with his busy friend. No chance at
unarmored mounts.

-Scenario 3 Unarmored mounts are a choice at the mount vender for all of classic.

Player A - Still levels casually to 60, gets there in 3 weeks.

Player B - Still levels to 60 asap, cause he’s hardcore like that.

Player C - Still levels to 60 extremely casually with his busy friend.

So tell me blizzard, why on earth does Player C dictate this decision? Is player C really going to cry and unsub because he and his casual friend had no chance at the mount in scenario 1? Is Scenario 2 going to make Player C happy? I know Player A and B will be pissed.

Did you lose the files that had the mounts? Would you have to recreate the unarmored mounts, and this wouldn’t be possible by launch of classic? What is the real reason blizzard? I don’t buy scenario 2 being the healthiest choice for classic.

7 Likes

You should do one where the mount is in perma!

2 Likes

Hmmm, I didn’t think about that. They are truely cool, I was selfishly placing myself between player A and B. Permanently adding them would take the flex aspect away from player A and B, however I would much rather they be added permanently then not at all.

End of day, Scenario 1,2, and 3 would have nearly no impact on how Player A, B, and C play. Just leaves everyone thinking, blizzard doesn’t know that players want to play the way they want to, and if we want our hands held we could play BFA.

4 Likes

Because having those umarmored mounts permanently available from the vendors wouldn’t be inauthentic to vanilla at all, right?

2 Likes

Fesz, the point is that blizzard is trying to manage how all players play, the scenarios are just that, hypothetical possible solutions/problems.

Scenario 3 would be a problem to an authentic vanilla experience, and is catering to casuals. I don’t think anyone would argue with you.

2 Likes

I don’t care if it’s inauthentic, not having them at all is also inauthentic. I’m no longer 10 years old so that’s also inauthentic to my vanilla experience

3 Likes

Scenario 4- Blizzard adds unarmored mounts to store for 20$

Player A - Still levels casually to 60, gets there in 3 weeks.

Player B - Still levels to 60 asap, cause he’s hardcore like that.

Player C - Still levels to 60 extremely casually with his busy friend.

Player D - Shouldn’t be playing classic, buys mount for 20$

Hopefully Players A, B, and C all spit on player D for supporting cancerous pay to flex garbage into a good game.

5 Likes

Cash shops are indicative of bad games

4 Likes

Good thing blizzard disagrees with you.

1 Like

Bump these mounts belong in the game and blizzard continues to ignore and censor passionate fans.

4 Likes