A really frustrating complaint to see the community making about the Allied Races is over the fact that Zandalari and Kul Tirans were not available at launch, a lot of which are littering the video they just put up of the last Allied Races to be added to BfA.
Now before I’m called a shill (and let’s face it, some among you will do that no matter what I say), Blizzard deserves to eat platefuls of for their constant PR blunders and questionable design philosophy in main systems and story direction, but there’s nothing about the complaints about the Allied Races that doesn’t smack of either entitlement at best and willful ignorance at worst.
BfA adds 8 new races. The last time 8 races got added to WoW, it was 2004 and the game was launching with the original faction races. Compared to the two races we got in BC and Cata, 8 is an explosive uptick in choice.
Let’s save the riots for when they make races only to put them behind a cash shop.
“But the Zandalari and Kul Tirans were selling points! Key features that we didn’t get until 7 months later!”
They were never the only selling point. The Allied Races as a whole were a selling point. Half of them were avaiable early and and another pair were available when you unlocked them.
“But I shouldn’t have to unlock a key feature!”
Unlocks in a game are not new. Smash Bros has always had playable characters behind unlocks. Whether or not you agree the requirements are reasonable is another matter entirely, but acting like Blizzard is kicking your dog because the trade off for four times the number of new races we got in BC and Cataclysm is that you have to unlock them first.
“But they’re not actually new races! Just reskins!”
They have unique class selections, visuals, customizations, and a full kit of unique voice emotes, sillys, and flirts. More importantly, they all have unique racial abilities. Model animations is not where you want to hang your hat on this one.
“Why should I have to OLD reps for some of these races!”
If we start lifting reputation unlocks for old rewards just because they were from a previous expansion, where do we stop? Should we make all the rewards available from the BC reps as well just because they’re 10 years old? Mounts, tabards, pets, etc. There’s an argument for that I guess.
i still want that fishing board thing from the Anglers or maybe that water-walking mount. But I don’t want them bad enough to go back and do it every day, and that’s my choice to make, because clearly if a player wants it, they’ll unlock it. Why should it be different for anything else?
“I’d have played these seven months ago but too late I’m unsubbed :^)”
Don’t kid yourself. The game has much steeper problems that new races aren’t going to fix and probably did more to drive people away from the game than not having these races straight out of the gate.
“BuT fOrCeD eNgAgEmEnT tImEs!”
This is personally frustrating for me 'cos I think it’s probably true and yet I don’t know why people think it’s a bad thing. Show me a game company where the developers wouldn’t prefer you spent more time on their titles than their competitors. What exactly is unreasonable about Blizzard building their game around encouraging you to spend more time in it? What’s the difference between content you find worthwhile to sink time into and content you won’t bother with? Your willingness to get the reward at the end of it?
People treat this point as a hammer to bludgeon every little thing they don’t like with it. Islands aren’t fun? Muh engagement times. Why don’t we have flying? Muh engagement times. Artificially lengthening your time in the game. I think this applies mainly to acquiring Azerite gear and the entire philosophy around RNG lootboxes from Warfronts, assaults, mythics, etc. It’s bad and predatory when it’s used to length your pursuit of weapons and gear, things that directly impact your performance in a raid (and I don’t mean by the 1% margin that your race accounts for, since that only seems to matter to super-dedicated min-maxers).
Are the unlock requirements behind the Allied Races a matter of arbitrarily stretching out engagement times or a reasonable trade-off for the sheer number that were being added through the system as a whole? Maybe two things are true at once, and i don’t mind it in this case. Considering the prereqs are all so easy you can do them without really having to go out of your way, this ain’t it chief.
Focus on the actual problems with this game, not the fact we got 8 races in a trickle instead of all at once.