OK. Fair, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, and it’s easy to make mistakes as to intention and tone in text on forums.
Sorry, if I was and/or am mistaken.
The difference is both options are (and should be) available.
The people who enjoy mega servers shouldn’t be forced to play on a server with 2,000 people.
The people who enjoy smaller population should simply play on a realm with a smaller population.
The people who like mega servers can have their cake to, everybody wins!
Except nobody wins because the people who say they want “authentic vanilla populations” keep rolling on mega servers instead, only to end up whining about it and demanding changes.
Again, if you don’t like megaservers the answer is simple, DON’T ROLL ON ONE.
its ok, you were mistaken because if you scroll up and read my posts non of them are evidential of what you were accusing me of
That’s actually toxic bro.
OK, thanks for pointing this out. I’ll have a re-read. Thank you for being civil 
1 Like
When did I say I didn’t like mega servers??
I love my server and I’m not leaving it.
Your logic is really bad.
This is all pointless, it doesn’t matter if you don’t agree, the hotfix is live EITHER WAY.
2 Likes
The hotfix is live because of trash casuals like you who demand everything in the game be available to them without effort.
id rather blizzard ban the bots, but i guess cranking up the black lotus spawnrate will serve their purpose of creating a terrible version of classic wow for them to use as an example for their arguments as to why they were originally right about people not enjoying it
1 Like
We find common agreement their brother.
One thing we can all agree on, blizzard doesn’t want classic to be a success.
Sure. Banning bots would definitely be desirable (imo). Do we have any verifiable reason to believe that this would result in any significant change to queue times (or anything else, for that matter)?
I’m a trash casual??
I’d compare our logs but I bet I don’t need to.
This, imo, is akin to saying, “On thing we can all agree on, doesn’t want to be a success.” - and in that context (or any context really), it seems to be an incredibly ridiculous and unsubstantiated claim.
no argument needs to be made about banning bots to make the que times lower. thats not the point. the point is there shouldnt be bots in the first place, and especially not to this extent
I just looked up your logs, your trash, and since you want to compare, here’s mine.
classic. warcraftlogs. com /character /us /arugal/ eshon
What extent? Can you give me some steps to verify to what extent there are bots?
blizzard is the owner and operator of world of warcraft. its their fault if wow succeeds or fails. saying they made it succeed or fail on purpose is a strategy to communicate a point about lack of effort or lack of executive oversight.
players filming bots, multiple cases of players complaining about bots, encountering bots in game and numerous threads about botting on the forums
Sure they are.
Have a good night.
I need lots of sleep so I can tank these lotus prices all day tomorrow.
1 Like
This is the first intelligent post in this thread.
If you have 5x the player base on the same landmass, resources have to be multiplied by 5 for the gameplay to be similar than Vanilla.
I personally think they should do it for all resources, not just lotus.
4 Likes
Being in the top 2% of all mages in the world.
I’m fine being that kind of trash.
1 Like