Wouldn’t it be more thorough and intelligent to have a blizzard employee review reports made about a player, instead of jus havin a random player report someone and they have a “behavior warning” message sitting on their screen?
On world of warcraft anniversary, it may be a bug or a spamm robot but I get non stop behavior warnings on all characters doing nothing. How bout blizzard employees fix this, do the intelligent route and not send out behavior warnings that seem so serious and so “warning you” without any review from an employee at all. this opens people up to getting banned for no reason, because of the language of the behavior warning. The behavior warning doesn’t give any indication that its been reviewed, going to be reviewed, could be fake. This seems like a really funb part of this game, thats a big thing that can override a lot of things and be used unfairly by an employee or player if they want to.
Need to really only give out behavior warnings when a reports been reviewed and offer proof to the player what they did wrong for documentation and all that. This seems so boneheaded and not thought out and dumb the way the reporting system is now. Lets improve it
Be mindful of what you say. If you’re mindful each and every time you decide to speak to another person, you’ll probably have an easier time remembering what might’ve gone wrong.
It is definitely bait, or IMO more likely, someone who parks a mammoth on top of an important quest NPC/vender. But they also aren’t wrong. People see reporting as a way to “get” the other guy.
I had an encounter yesterday as an example. In classic I ran up on someone not moving and almost dead at a graveyard. Someone who spirit resed, afked for 10 minutes, and had some incidental aggro right? Well, being the nice guy I am I taunted and started killing it.
Turns out this guy is doing some sort of nonsense, cusses me out and reports me for killing the MOB. Yeah, after you call me a f-ing idiot, I’m killing your mob. So I counter reported him. Guess we will see what comes of that if anything, but it definitely happens.
And a human is going to unravel the problem from a short summary and the same notes you already have?
It’s a nice thought, believing that humans might rule your way, but if you get a human overseeing the automated process, he or she is going to receive a short description of the offending event, the trigger that caught it, and the same information the automation picked up.
They’re not going to drop everything for an exhaustive search of un-promoted data. Instead, if they aren’t aware of incorrect results being determined in automation - they won’t do a thing.
Behavior warnings popup if enough people report you for anything chat related if I remember correctly I just ignore them whenever one pops up if no action was taken on my account I couldn’t care less about a automated warning
