Thrall Cheated

[Taquitaux-dalaran]

Can we ger jk rowling to do the retconning?

[Hamstar-draktharon (Hamstar)]

Mok’gora

“in a traditional Mak’gora, the challengers set the terms of the engagement.”

[Zulzamba-farstriders]

I’m not taking anything out on you. Go to your safe space, it’s going to be ok. All I know is it’s going to be you with your opinion and me with mine, and neither of us will change our view, so, you want to spend spend the next umpteen hours saying “No” while I find ways of saying “Yes”? Not me.

[Akston-bloodhoof (Akston)]

Can we ger jk rowling to do the retconning?

You are playing with fire.

[Valrena-wyrmrest-accord]

Seems he paid for it already, no?

Losing the elements and his gary sue powers.

[Zulzamba-farstriders]

Yeah, based on what the Elements did to Thrall, looks like he and Garrosh decided no magic allowed.

[Akston-bloodhoof (Akston)]

I’m not taking anything out on you. Go to your safe space, it’s going to be ok. All I know is it’s going to be you with your opinion and me with mine, and neither of us will change our view, so, you want to spend spend the next umpteen hours saying “No” while I find ways of saying “Yes”? Not me.

I am saying “No, because everything in Lore agrees with me. Nothing in Lore says he cheated”.

[Bipzi-wyrmrest-accord (Bipzi)]

Abusing the elements for personal gain doesn’t mean he cheated on the terms of the Mak’Gora in itself.

[Wuzeh-wyrmrest-accord]

Nice hole ya be diggin’ here.

[Tokali-thrall]

A Mak’gora requires the duelists to have only one weapon. Thrall had the Doomhammer and Garrosh had Gorehowl.

Then Thrall used a second weapon: The Elements.

Therefore, he cheated.

[Zulzamba-farstriders]

Cool, I say Thrall says he cheated. That’s my point, you’re doing the very thing I said would happen. We will argue all day over something absolutely meaningless in our lives and reality.

[Bipzi-wyrmrest-accord (Bipzi)]

but I ain’t wasting my day arguing over pretend fantasy characters in a video game.

And yet here you are.

Hmmmmm

[Zulzamba-farstriders]

Ok… see ya.

[Akston-bloodhoof (Akston)]

A Mak’gora requires the duelists to have only one weapon. Thrall had the Doomhammer and Garrosh had Gorehowl.

Then Thrall used a second weapon: The Elements.

Therefore, he cheated.

A Mak’Gora requires a witness for both sides.
No witnesses.
Not a Mak’Gora

[Wuzeh-wyrmrest-accord]

Cool, I say Thrall says he cheated.

No he doesnt, you literal desperate troll.

[Âñtîpm-jubeithos]

Makgora is a honorable duel, if using fel magic is cheating (Guldan) or using poison (Garrosh), then so is calling lightning from the sky.

[Hamstar-draktharon (Hamstar)]

The elementals of AU Dranor don’t give a flying rats rear about two orcs fighting let alone the elementals of Azeroth.

Also they did no do anything to him. It was his self doubt.

[Wuzeh-wyrmrest-accord]

Its funny how all of these points are rendered moot by the vid I linked a bit ago. If it wasn’t against the rules there, it flies in Nagrand.

Cairne vs Garrosh rules dont always apply.

[Tokali-thrall]

A Mak’Gora requires a witness for both sides.
No witnesses.
Not a Mak’Gora

Nope.

The rules can always be rearranged. That rule was never a constant one.

(Also, when Thrall said that he challenged Garrosh to a Mak’gora, that means it was a Mak’gora)

[Akston-bloodhoof (Akston)]

Its funny how all of these points are rendered moot by the vid I linked a bit ago. If it wasn’t against the rules there, it flies in Nagrand.

Cairne vs Garrosh rules dont always apply.

People want to ignore nearly every single time makgora ever happened. And only look at Thrall v Garrosh take 2.

Nope.

The rules can usually be rearranged. That rule was never a constant one.

Yes. The rules can 100% all be rearranged. Both sides agree to them before hand. This is evidenced by plenty of previous makgoras.