There's no reason not to have Dual Spec

WoW Classic Cataclysm Classic Discussion
21

100% agree with you you’re right the arguments against jewelspeck are silly to say the least.

And quite honestly if it’s really that big of an issue just make it so you can’t respect in dungeons and in dungeons and in raids done simple.

It’s not that it would be that big of a deal anyway but whatever quite frankly if it gets us dual spec at this point I’d be willing to for them to do that.

Give us Duel speck And just make it so we can’t respect inside dungeons or raids Or arena.

There you go good simple finished

22

Do they have three hearts?

Who is that?

I’ve never heard of that dungeon.

Is that Jewelcrafting Specialization?

1 Like
23

“muh alt posting wahh” is not a counter argument.

24

I find it funny that the only thing you seem to be able to do is make fun of my spelling

25

I would never do that.

26

Your sarcasm is painful

27

Your false accusations are hurtful.

28

Well do forgive me but it seems like 90% of the replies that you give to my comments are generally making fun of my spelling errors.

I’m dyslexic OK no I’m not a good speller but that doesn’t mean that I don’t have good input.

29

What spelling errors?

30

I’m on my main.

I disagree with dual spec.

Dual spec is purely a QOL change and I don’t think changes for the pure sake of changes is good for what is supposed to be a recreation.

2 Likes
31

Empathy is fine with changes so long as they’re changes that he wants and is okay with.

And he’ll insult you for disagreeing with him like a child throwing a tantrum. So, naturally, I disagree with him on principle just because it’s funny to see him rage.

32

It’s not changes for the sake of changes it’s a good change because it be better for the player experience.

Again all they need to do is make it so you can’t respect dungeons raids and arenas.

You’re good after that You still have to pay the gold cost if you want to respect either one of the trees it’s fine.

I don’t understand what the issue is I really don’t

33

Megarune, note he actually contradicts himself in the very same sentence.

He’s just another naysayer that takes a level 58 boost up the posterior and HvH BG change while simultaneously screaming words like “recreaction.”

34

It’s OK 1st off it’s not just changes that I want thank you there’s a whole ton of other people that would want dual spec too thank you very much.

Is throwing a child as tantrum really why because I’m passionate about a change that I know could be beneficial to the game.

Speaking from someone’s point of view that’s been playing the game on and off for 16 years really.

Speaking from someone that thinks about whenever he suggests a change and thinks about the good and the bad.

Is watching the game die around me Is constantly seen a tank shortage.

Is end PVP die on mass and people leaving the game on mass.

No you’re right clearly I don’t take any of that into account at all I’m just a little stupid player that’s throwing a temperature tantrum.

And coming from someone that actually doesn’t give any input on what I say and just likes to make fun of my spelling errors.

Is so really

35

You wound me! I was only trying to be supportive and you falsely accuse me of such harshness! :sob:

36

HvH fixes a core issue of the game currently where an entire faction quit one aspect of the game, while that aspect requires both factions to work.

HvH does not force any player to do anything.

Dual spec is a change that fixes nothing and is purely QoL.

People argue that it will fix the tank issue, but in order to fix the tank issue, you would need to drastically overhaul the game, or force players into the tank role.

You’re just a mong who got his lil feelers hurt by some words and can’t comprehend simple subjects.

Calling a trash can a trash can is not an insult, just calling it like it is.

Which is why I call you an idiot.

Rage lol

Cope and seethe harder.

3 Likes
37

I disagree with this change as well. Have since it was announced. I have been against pay to win boosts since they dropped in retail all those years ago.

Cope and seethe harder mong.

38

So what you’re describing is a pure QOL change for the sake of a change.

Got it.

39
1 Like
40

This is wildly inaccurate