- solo 3s with same dampening pace as regular 3s
- solo 3s random
- solo 2s double dps
- solo 2s healer dps
- solo 2s random
- auto 3s/2s (premade like skirms/rando bgs)
need more ai automation
We already have the player base split over
Random bg
Random epic bg
Skirmish
Brawl
Shuffle
2s
3s
RBg
Classic 2s
Classic 3s
Classic 5s
Any more game modes and nobody will get a queue
3 Likes
I understand where you’re coming from, as my busy IRL has me thankful for Solo this xpak where I usually RBG’ed in the past. However, I think WoW is already straying too far from its MMORPG roots. Automation is not a good idea if we want to keep it healthy and competitive. It’s a social game at its core after all… at least originally.
Let’s be real, no one’s playing this
4 Likes
This is what should of been introduced instead of the shuffle.
1 Like
“times change” - warlords of draenor cinematic
“Progress for the sake of progress must be discouraged” -Umbridge
lol but now really. Is it worth making things more accessible? Maybe, because the game population has dwindled… However, I think asking why these were necessary changes to begin with, and seeing when and where the game has gone astray from what made it initially stand out is the correct long-term approach to revitalizing it in accordance with its unique vision. We have enough single player and phone games.
My raid team is on break til next tier so I’m trying to satisfy my pvp itch. I queued a dps solo shuffle and estimated wait time was 46 minutes at 0 cr. I sat there for 5 minutes and decided it wasnt worth and queued 3 shuffles on this hpal. I got a boa 50 conquest token for my trouble.
If blizz can’t do any better than that then I’d rather them not add anymore solo stuff in the game.
I honestly thought when everyone wanted solo qs it was that and not shuffle.
time to remove 2v2 :^ )
It should of been a solo/duo dynamic q with different ladder ranking but using same player pool as 3v3 ladder so that it hyper inflates activity across the board. People who don’t understand basics would complain “but teams would have an advantage!!” so what you’re not ranked against them in the ladder so shutup and enjoy the hyper active qs!
This would go alongside a revamped LFG which would of been freaking sweet man.
In the system that could allow duo queue and getting a random third for a game, I’m not sure two dps who want to play together and wait for a random healer would realistically get queues to pop
That’s what “Dynamic Q” means. You would pick your specs you want to play with and the more you limit it the longer you’re going to have to wait in q.
Oh ok i thought by Dynamic queue you meant you could queue with a friend in a group of 2 and get a random third for a match.
Yes you can, but it just automates a third for you based off your criteria.
How would that work out if someone is choosing to play a spec that isn’t great? Outlaw rogue for example.
I doubt anyone listing themselves goes out of their way to click “oh ill play with outlaw rogue”.
I think dynamic queueing would just reinforce the FOTM specs.
What I would rather see is going back to % titles (maybe adding awards to % titles on a weekly toggle?) for all specs, individually, in all brackets. We’d see more variety in the 2s/3s brackets if titles were done by spec, not by whole ladder.
I think I don’t care about your thoughts on it tbh.
1 Like
Careful there, Swole can only heart react your posts so fast. Wouldn’t want him to accidentally create a time paradox.
2 Likes
Oh boy, we faking things again. The past repeats itself, welcome to the ignore list so I don’t have to see you pretend to be intelligent anymore.
1 Like
Swole likes this post.
2 Likes