Just thought that Blizz forgot about that since well, there’s not a single Rdruid or MW in AWC.
Those specs are hilariously bad, but I guess blizz doesn’t want them to be playable in competitive environment 
8 Likes
by competitive environment, you mean the top 8 in the entire world? the top 1% of the the top 1%?
resto/mw are perfectly playable at every other level.
there’s no such thing as perfect balance, blizzard does way better than most other games.
yeea no
not true either
10 Likes
Are you on crack blizzard does much worse than other games.
2 Likes
data says otherwise but you’re welcomed to believe whatever
what team does better than blizzard?
no they don’t
no no theres 5 : hpal rsham disc rets and mages
3 Likes
You mean this data?
https://www.arenamate.net/
Hpal -1235
Disc - 1185
Rsham - 386
resto druid - 131
Mistweaver - 37
Seems to me that the data says druid and mw are not really viable compared to the other classes.
12 Likes
oh look, they’re played, meaning they’re playable. ty for the data.
2 Likes
Dumb
7 Likes
literally 10x less represented…
I don’t think you understand what “viable” means
9 Likes
Bloomsday hyper troll
I’m surprised by how many people still fall for Bloomsday’s trolls.
1 Like
You are delusional- I means seriously delusional.
These two classes have the best burst healing or get of jail abilities. With this new “100-0 inside a GCD” meta we have, these healers are really the only choice.
I honestly don’t see things changing for a couple of years
Everyone flocks to the fotm/ ez climb class. Nothing to do with viability. Remember rdruid in 8.2?
1 Like
Again- you are wrong. These are considered FOTM only because, as a healer, they offer some help against this 100-0 meta. I bet there are more hpals and discs that wish they could play another class versus FOTM players
It surprising to me how you look at two numbers… 1235 and 37. And try to explain it away with “everyone flocks to ez class” and has nothing to do with viability.
Care to elaborate why FOTM explains a 33x difference between the two classes? (ie: this means for every 100 paladins, you see 3 MW)
1 Like
Actually, 6. Prot Pally is now a healer and has more than double MW in 2400+
2 Likes
Rshamans blow just as hard as Rdruids but are lucky to have some synergy with Ret. Rets do the same healing as a Resto Shaman. If Ret gets nerfed Rshaman falls off the face of the earth. Look at every AWC the Ret is doing like 90% of the Rshamans heals with WOG. Its pathetic.
Playstyle don’t fit the meta. MW and Rdruid are practically the same way mechanically from bfa, so why are they bad now? Mastery is way low for rdruid so might have to wait a bit longer for more gear in future patches. Mw been squishy for a while, new 2 shot meta not favoring it. Things change.
Everyone flocks to the fotm/ ez climb class. Nothing to do with viability. Remember rdruid in 8.2?
Playstyle don’t fit the meta. MW and Rdruid are practically the same way mechanically from bfa, so why are they bad now? Mastery is way low for rdruid so might have to wait a bit longer for more gear in future patches. Mw been squishy for a while, new 2 shot meta not favoring it. Things change.
So that means… they aren’t viable in today’s meta? Thanks for agreeing with me.