Please highlight where that definition has the words “sex” or “Slave”
2 Likes
They all are married ,do you know what you are talking about.You have you main wife that controls the house and the lesser wives. You need to read up on cultures before hammering this.
1 Like
Anuke! You can’t just ask people why they’re killing them!
Stop trying to be an opportunist to use tragedy to push your crap.
This is the victims moment, not yours.
- No. This infringes on other people’s rights and personal choices. You do not have to wear skimpy armor if you do not wish to. That is as far as your choices go. If Blizzard wants to make such items, that is their creative right. Not yours.
- People have wanted the pants version in game for years. Again, this is a case of personal choice. Add glyph variants for those who want it or perhaps overhaul Warlock Demons to be comparable to Hunter Pets. Also familiarize yourself with what a Succubus actually is historically. They are not submissive, they are predators that kill men.
- Fair. Lets replace them with loaves of bread. It worked great for Scholomance when other people were offended by the depictions of death. Point of fact, lets remove everything one individual finds offensive.
- No arguments on the final point. A more robust character design interface would be great.
3 Likes
Then they wouldn’t be a concubine. Blizzard should change their name since that’s not what they are according to you.
Head bang moment 
If we’re going by the definition you provided,
is not a
To cohabit is consensual.
1 Like
I was wondering when you’d resurface.
-
Anyone should be allowed to dress however they want for any reason they want. Removing options is just a step removed from putting everyone in Burkas. People can control their urges without a draconian dress code.
-
The succubus thing makes no sense. They’re a species of demon that’s well established, not just in WoW lore but Christian mythology as well. I do agree with adding an incubus, though. As well as a ton of other demon skins. Women and demons are different things.
-
Concubines are a real thing. Again, you can’t project into this. As far as we know, all those demons/blood elves wanted to be there. It’s a fantasy game. Fantasies are ok.
-
Agree with body types, and many more customizations besides.
2 Likes
Not saying it’s you, but that your topics (which is considered bait) were already talked about.
Either way, there’s more serious things to fix in game to curb horrible players and bad behavior like idk…ACTUAL MODERATORS IN GAME. WoW would be so much better if they had actual moderators and not a robot listening to in game player reports of spammers (lookin’ at you AOTC Mythic P2W sellers) and cleaning up the place.
3 Likes
No.
You don’t like revealing mogs? Don’t use them.
The succubus is fine. It’s a demon the warlock made a deal with to gain her services, not a sex slave
This just in: villains do bad things. News at 11.
Only thing you said that was reasonable.
3 Likes
THIS ^^^^^
What does this have to do with me
When you look at the past on concubines to reference to demons it is a rough type of marriage but most people don’t know this til they research more on the subject.
Shoot, Did it ping you? My bad. I assumed you only get pings when you get replies like every other forum out there, not linking a forum post. Why is this even a thing X_X
No worries. This person and I are not the same though lol. Just saying.
Seriously, no kidding!
1 Like
I know, It was more of me pointing out that the topic of “succubus 2 sexy” was brought up by others and there was other threads talking about it yesterday (which I think got nuked bc it got spicy, rip) before OP made their post. My english ain’t so great.
2 Likes
I used to think of you as a borderline troll. There were certain issues I totally agreed with you on while other issues were more divisive. But, I was never really certain whether you were just trolling.
…however, this post today solidifies your troll status. Unquestionably.
3 Likes