I know. You mentioned that in your original post.
Likewise, there will be a larger % of pretty much every other Healer, rDruids included.
Right. So, what is “Meta?” What does it mean? How does a “Meta” work? What makes something “Meta?” I mean, it’s pretty obvious that “Meta” means, essentially, “That which is (over-)performing well (by comparison).”
I get that it isn’t just a MW prob - for instance, hPally is better than all the other Healers, and dPriest is pretty darn good in RBGs rn; however, MWs poor showing in this RBG “Meta” is def due to their issues. I mean, there’s a reason ppl aren’t taking MWs. It’s bc they need work. They don’t really bring anything to the table - and in most cases, they’re just an added liability; in fact, it’s kinda like playing on hard-mode bringing a MW over, say, a hPally or a dPriest. Yeah, they can perform - hence there are some MWs on the board; however, ppl aren’t really bring them, for the most part. That’s also clear by the board. If they were in a good spot, we’d see more of them; likewise, MWs wouldn’t be getting shut out of low CR/no CR YOLOs.
Honestly, I’m a bit confused: are you trying to argue that MWs are good in RBGs or not? I kinda think we’re likely on the same page, but arguing around each other
Edit: I guess what I’m trying to get at here is that, despite the irrationality of the stigma affecting MWs ability to - at the very least - participate in low CR/no CR YOLOs, the stigma certainly does have a basis in reality - the reality being MWs issues.