The Horde Is Better Without Blood Elves

[Amadis-draka (Amadis)]

@Jawah-moon-guard

The best part about my threads is that there’s always enough truth and fact behind everything that I say that I always have a very solid argument, regardless of how controversal my opinion might be amidst the majority.

Citation needed. This doesn’t seem canon to me.

For example:

@Jawah-moon-guard

Played through the Blood Elf starting zone and was told to kill a friendly sightseeing Night Elf tourist. Like wtf?

And then, if that wasn’t bad enough, I was given a quest to assassinate a Dwarven mapmaker, while he was waiting for a guide. I posed as the guide, and pulled him into his friend’s house and murdered him inside.

Those Night Elves weren’t Tourists, and Prospector Anvilward wasn’t a mapmaker, nor was he lured into his friends house.

@Jawah-moon-guard

The Blood Elves that we know now are just a rebellious pirate group that overthrew their governement after Kael’thas went to Outland and joined Illidan. Hence why the Horde’s Blood Elves have no quarrel, and are in fact joyful, with just rushing into Outland to murder their Prince, as soon as possible.

Lor’themar did not overthrow anyone to become Regent Lord after Kael’thas left, nor were the Blood Elves rushing to Outland to murder Kael’thas, rather they wanted to join and help Kael’thas.

As these are your only two other threads you’ve made on the story forums, it would seem you provide neither enough truth or fact for anything you say to be event remotely considered a solid argument.