You seem to not know the difference between proto-drakes and Titan-ascended dragons.
yessss Dracthyr Warlock here I come
Unless you play evoker, you donât need a glyph for this.
I do, I like my Drac a lot. Itâs the class that keeps me from playing it more. The real issue is itâs not a real ranged class (dungeons with the constant running around make empowered casting a real pain) and itâs too soft. No wonder it gets eaten alive in PVP, short range and falls over to a fart doesnât work in PVP.
The Helm of Domination was destroyed, blame Sylvanas for that one.
1 Like
And is that happening NOW? Can a Dracthyr or Earthen be a DK? No? Oh, so I was correct then.
Your argument is incorrect, I was talking about currently, not back from Shadowlands when they updated DK to expand to all current races, at the time.
No new DKs or DHs are being made NOW.
Then they need to offer new races to evoker if thatâs the case⌠we donât want to a dargons, we wanna be evokers.
âŚEvokers is also the dragon class so it makes sense that only the dragon people can be evokers.
3 Likes
They can teach it to the other races, theyâve made far worse class/race combinations and itâd be incredibly out of character for them start caring about that now when we are on the 9th expansion.
You donât seem to understand. Evoker as the class utilizes their innate dragon powers that they alone can organically produce. No one else can be an evoker because they lack wings and the organs able to produce breath attacks.
2 Likes
Theyâve retconned FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR better lore before, they can do it again⌠I feel most people donât the dracthyr because theyâre not appealing to look at and aesthetics are pretty important.
They are not going to ret con an entire class.
Then maybe request draconoids with wings?
Dunno what to tell you here champ. I donât really support the notion of all races/all classes.
Unless you work for blizzard or have sort of inside scoop, thatâs not set in stone.
Theyâve retconned far better lore, they can do it again.
Or they can just give us visage form that doesnât revert to dragon form? Add a 3D dragon head or wings over the character to represent the race still when using the spells that âneed itâ
What your asking is akin to say ret-conning paladins from using the light to say only using say arcane magic. Not gonna happen.
And how would that be fair to worgens again?
I think this should be a solid no, period, unless they are not going to force worgens to transform too.
You can say itâs not going to happen until youâre blue in the face, MEANS NOTHING.
Theyâve retconned better lore, theyâve made dreadful lore decision out of the good ones, they can fix this colossal mistake⌠with a minor low effort change.
No class is locked behind worgan⌠Iâm not going to begin to entertain that one.
They need to give the dracthyr visage form that doesnât revert back⌠locking a class behind a specific race was error #1 when making the class/race. I know this may come as a shock to you, but people care about what their characters look like.
Worgen Demon Hunters first, then. DH is way, way ahead of the line in terms of classes which need more race options.
Tell me one time where they ret-conned an entire class in the franchiseâs history.
Then you agree dracthyr even fighting in visage form in any class is not really fair to worgen, which is why i made the original post in this thread. Otherwise why would you even be replying to me in the first place?
No.
1 Like
Both at the same time! DH at least doesnât have to use a ugly dracthyr⌠elves are perty.
Because Worgen have other choices. Every class currently available to them except Druid can just be Human instead if they want to be a Worgen that never shapeshifts and Druids have the option of KT or Nelf. Evokers canât, and if they could, it would no longer be a problem because we wouldnât be tied to being goofy looking lizards.
It doesnât matter, it can be done.
Why would I ever say that? Worgan donât have class locked behind them.
Yes they do.