I wish Blizard would speak about the target cap situation. WW single target needed nerfed. I’m fine that they did it, but target capping a small number of specs makes their ability to tune is properly impossible. WW was already average at best in m+. We got worse in ST (fair) and m+ today (terrible).
These buffs / nerfs today made Balance Druid better in m+ (they were already meta) and make WW worse in m+ (already bad in m+). It seems there is no logic behind the target capped specs with this tuning. I want to understand the point of this.
3 Likes
There’s always a lot of confusion about target caps, what they mean, and how much they actually matter. Seiryoku put together a great article on Peak that explains it all very well.
The TLDR is that target caps aren’t anywhere near as bad as people think/say and can be completely irrelevant in some situations.
2 Likes
Blizz is overly cautious with WW when it comes to AoE because they dont want giga pull and stun and bung (even though that still kinda happens). I understand their reasoning, but I don’t get why they go through with it regardless considering what else is in the game. That said, it does feel like WW does get it “worse” just because we have a lot of stuff that AoEs and that’s a lot of stuff to keep an eye on. If I had to change one thing with WW’s AoE, I’d let FoF full cleave 5 targets then half damage anything past that. That or revert SotWL to original recipe.
oh? yet they let balance, elemental shaman, ret, all mages, spriest, both dk dps specs, all rogues, jsut go ham and destroy in big pulls
2 Likes