And the majority of it is because of what they did to the spec in Legion. It’s not fun to play. Mechanics are awkward, and why would you ruin a spec with a rework like that? It was completely unnecessary.
Even if Blizzard were to give Survival Hunter major buffs, nobody would know if it was OP, because nobody plays the spec anymore. Give us old Surv back.
The spec is overall well designed however it still needs work
They could add like 3 changes that would completely fix every issue with the spec but blizzard didn’t at all touch it when they needed to refine the spec they just made
I just dont undestand what they were thinking when they made it melee, as if we didnt have enought melee classes and specs already, and only one archer/shooting class. It clear most people who play hunter do it for the archer fantasy.
So not playing my hunter since Legion because the one spec I liked got reworked into something that isn’t fun IMO is on me?
Okay. Again, I don’t work at Blizz.
Because A) the class started as a hybrid melee class, and B) about half the notable hunter archetypes/heroes in WoW are actually meleers.
Honestly, I think it’s awesome that hunters get such massively different playstyles offered under a single umbrella. I’d hate for it to go back to milquetoast “three pew pew versions, pick gun or bow, shoot, loot, repeat.” I mean, I don’t want to be a mage or a warlock, thanks.
Ranged survival was fun, but current survival is also fun. I wish they would just make it a two spec class, and make Beastmaster the melee spec with the beast talents, and Marksmanship the ranged spec.
Give Marks some old school survival skills and call it a day.