when we win a SS after sitting in que for 30min+ we should be getting more than just 100 points. at least 175 and when we lose we should at least get 25 or 50… only because the que times are extremely long…
1 Like
This suggestion is brought to you by common core math.
6 Likes
“if it never worked, why fix it?”
-bobby kotick
I mean winning only 100 points for a win for a 30min que is less rewarding… that’s why i don’t do SS while gearing. better to do actual 3’s… SS is nothing but stressful so why make it some way rewarding.
LMAO what ??
1 Like
im quitting my job and going for rank 1 
Hmm. I’m not quite sure I follow. 
Although I don’t disagree that queue times are too long, and this could likely be remedied to a degree by buffing healer mmr.
only think when you lose, you should still get conquest. i dont rbg much, but i recall having experiences where i lost the rbg, but since it was a close match i still got conquest points. so going 2-4 should always give like 30 conquest. maybe 1-5 give like 15, and 0 for 0-6
edit: your daily skirmish win gives 25, and after that i think its 8? you could spam 6 skirmishes in the time it takes to get into a shuffle, go 2-4 in those skirms, and come out with more conquest from non rated gameplay then rated. feels a lil bad
Wait a minute here OP…what “points” are you referring to?
Swole will beat you too it.
you’re not wrong.
you’re not going to get rank one by just losing…you obviously missed the point. i meant points where you can buy gear… not points as in rating… use your brain next time
Q as healer, the q times are much shorter. Youre welcome glhf
there was no point, that’s the problem